PFFD vs. FCVT
PFFD (Global X U.S. Preferred ETF) and FCVT (First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. PFFD is passively managed, while FCVT is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PFFD returned -0.16%/yr vs 7.58%/yr for FCVT. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PFFD charges 0.23%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FCVT.
Performance
PFFD vs. FCVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PFFD achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly lower than FCVT's 25.61% return.
PFFD
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 0.16%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 7.65%
- 3Y*
- 5.10%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- —
FCVT
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 7.08%
- YTD
- 25.61%
- 6M
- 25.00%
- 1Y
- 47.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
PFFD vs. FCVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | 2.29% | 3.22% | 7.07% | 6.85% | -20.20% | 5.07% | 8.90% | 17.43% | -3.94% | 0.85% |
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF | 25.61% | 19.60% | 11.92% | 7.12% | -20.88% | 4.23% | 51.02% | 22.30% | -2.28% | 2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFD and FCVT is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2017 | 0.50 |
The correlation between PFFD and FCVT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
PFFD vs. FCVT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PFFD
FCVT
Financial Services
Utilities
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
PFFD
FCVT
Utilities
PFFD
FCVT
Technology
PFFD
FCVT
-
Industrials
PFFD
FCVT
-
Communication Services
PFFD
FCVT
-
Real Estate
PFFD
FCVT
-
Basic Materials
PFFD
FCVT
-
Consumer Cyclical
PFFD
FCVT
Healthcare
PFFD
FCVT
Consumer Defensive
PFFD
-
FCVT
-
Energy
PFFD
-
FCVT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFFD vs. FCVT — Risk / Return Rank
PFFD
FCVT
PFFD vs. FCVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) and First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFFD | FCVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.50 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 5.58 | -4.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.81 | 20.90 | -17.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFFD | FCVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.07 | 2.97 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.54 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.68 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
PFFD vs. FCVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFD drawdown since its inception was -30.93%, roughly equal to the maximum FCVT drawdown of -31.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFD and FCVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFD | FCVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.93% | -31.79% | +0.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.97% | -8.47% | +2.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.84% | -15.06% | +4.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.45% | -30.43% | +5.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.79% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.68% | -1.20% | -2.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.59% | -10.36% | +3.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.01% | 2.26% | -0.25% |
Volatility
PFFD vs. FCVT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X U.S. Preferred ETF (PFFD) is 2.09%, while First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that PFFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFFD | FCVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 6.07% | -3.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.32% | 12.99% | -7.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.19% | 15.94% | -8.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.98% | 14.09% | -3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.76% | 14.85% | -2.09% |
PFFD vs. FCVT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFD has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is lower than FCVT's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFFD vs. FCVT - Dividend Comparison
PFFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.37%, more than FCVT's 1.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF | 1.19% | 1.98% | 1.30% | 1.76% | 3.71% | 23.07% | 1.72% | 1.60% | 1.85% | 2.18% | 1.88% | 0.59% |
PFFD Global X U.S. Preferred ETF | 6.37% | 6.37% | 6.42% | 6.49% | 6.63% | 5.09% | 5.17% | 5.48% | 6.21% | 1.94% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFFD and FCVT have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCVT has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to PFFD (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFD dropped -30.93% vs FCVT's -31.79%.
On 5-year performance, FCVT leads with 7.58% vs -0.16% for PFFD. On fees, PFFD is cheaper at 0.23% per year. On volatility, PFFD has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FCVT has performed better with a 7.58% return vs -0.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PFFD is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FCVT.
PFFD has the higher dividend yield at 6.37%, compared with 1.19% for FCVT.
They also come from different issuers: Global X and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.23% for PFFD and 0.95% for FCVT.
FCVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PFFD and FCVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer