PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFFA vs. FCVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFFA vs. FCVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) and First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFFA achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly lower than FCVT's 25.61% return.


PFFA

1D
-0.70%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
3.08%
6M
4.03%
1Y
14.79%
3Y*
14.46%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*

FCVT

1D
-1.20%
1M
7.08%
YTD
25.61%
6M
25.00%
1Y
47.07%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
12.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFFA vs. FCVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
3.08%8.22%16.11%26.45%-20.91%23.53%-7.87%31.99%-7.10%
FCVT
First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF
25.61%19.60%11.92%7.12%-20.88%4.23%51.02%22.30%-6.96%

Correlation

The correlation between PFFA and FCVT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2018

0.50

The correlation between PFFA and FCVT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

PFFA vs. FCVT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PFFA
FCVT

Real Estate

41.2%

-

Financial Services

28.1%
0.7%

Industrials

10.2%

-

Communication Services

5.3%

-

Energy

3.2%

-

Technology

3.0%

-

Utilities

2.3%
1.3%

Healthcare

0.9%
0.7%

Basic Materials

0.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Real Estate

PFFA
41.2%
FCVT

-

Financial Services

PFFA
28.1%
FCVT
0.7%

Industrials

PFFA
10.2%
FCVT

-

Communication Services

PFFA
5.3%
FCVT

-

Energy

PFFA
3.2%
FCVT

-

Technology

PFFA
3.0%
FCVT

-

Utilities

PFFA
2.3%
FCVT
1.3%

Healthcare

PFFA
0.9%
FCVT
0.7%

Basic Materials

PFFA
0.3%
FCVT

-

Consumer Cyclical

PFFA
0.2%
FCVT
0.7%

Consumer Defensive

PFFA

-

FCVT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFFA vs. FCVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFFA
PFFA Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PFFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

FCVT
FCVT Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FCVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVT Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFFA vs. FCVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) and First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFFAFCVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.50

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

5.58

-3.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.79

20.90

-13.11

PFFA vs. FCVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFFA Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is comparable to the FCVT Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFFA and FCVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFFAFCVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

2.97

-0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.54

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.24

0.68

-0.44

Drawdowns

PFFA vs. FCVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFFA drawdown since its inception was -70.52%, which is greater than FCVT's maximum drawdown of -31.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFA and FCVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFFAFCVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.52%

-31.79%

-38.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.49%

-8.47%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.15%

-15.06%

+2.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.70%

-30.43%

+7.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-1.20%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.65%

-10.36%

+3.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.26%

-0.36%

Volatility

PFFA vs. FCVT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) is 1.87%, while First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that PFFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFFAFCVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.87%

6.07%

-4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.68%

12.99%

-7.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.02%

15.94%

-8.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.51%

14.09%

-2.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.84%

14.85%

+16.99%

PFFA vs. FCVT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PFFA has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FCVT's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PFFA vs. FCVT - Dividend Comparison

PFFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.62%, more than FCVT's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVT
First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF
1.19%1.98%1.30%1.76%3.71%23.07%1.72%1.60%1.85%2.18%1.88%0.59%
PFFA
Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF
9.62%9.47%9.18%9.56%10.75%7.64%8.54%10.02%5.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFFA and FCVT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCVT has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to PFFA (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFFA dropped -70.52% vs FCVT's -31.79%.

On 5-year performance, FCVT leads with 7.58% vs 6.57% for PFFA. On fees, FCVT is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, PFFA has been the lower-risk option at 1.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FCVT has performed better with a 7.58% return vs 6.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCVT is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.47% for PFFA.

PFFA has the higher dividend yield at 9.62%, compared with 1.19% for FCVT.

They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.47% for PFFA and 0.95% for FCVT.

FCVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFFA and FCVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer