PFFA vs. EVPF
PFFA (Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF) and EVPF (Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PFFA charges 1.47%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for EVPF.
Performance
PFFA vs. EVPF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PFFA
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 3.08%
- 6M
- 4.03%
- 1Y
- 14.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.46%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- —
EVPF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PFFA vs. EVPF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF | 1.61% |
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF | 1.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PFFA and EVPF is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2026 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PFFA vs. EVPF — Risk / Return Rank
PFFA
EVPF
PFFA vs. EVPF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF (PFFA) and Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF (EVPF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PFFA | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.79 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PFFA | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.12 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.24 | 1.13 | -0.88 |
Drawdowns
PFFA vs. EVPF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PFFA drawdown since its inception was -70.52%, which is greater than EVPF's maximum drawdown of -2.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFFA and EVPF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PFFA | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.52% | -2.36% | -68.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.49% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.15% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -0.17% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -0.52% | -6.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | — | — |
Volatility
PFFA vs. EVPF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PFFA | EVPF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.87% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.68% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.02% | 4.31% | +2.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.51% | 4.31% | +7.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.84% | 4.31% | +27.53% |
PFFA vs. EVPF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PFFA has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than EVPF's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
PFFA vs. EVPF - Dividend Comparison
PFFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.62%, more than EVPF's 1.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EVPF Eaton Vance Preferred Securities and Income ETF | 1.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PFFA Virtus InfraCap U.S. Preferred Stock ETF | 9.62% | 9.47% | 9.18% | 9.56% | 10.75% | 7.64% | 8.54% | 10.02% | 5.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PFFA and EVPF have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EVPF is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EVPF is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 1.47% for PFFA.
PFFA has the higher dividend yield at 9.62%, compared with 1.08% for EVPF.
They also come from different issuers: Virtus Investment Partners and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 1.47% for PFFA and 0.39% for EVPF.
Find the right allocation for PFFA and EVPF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer