PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFE vs. NUKZ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PFE vs. NUKZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pfizer Inc. (PFE) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFE achieves a 6.34% return, which is significantly lower than NUKZ's 7.72% return.


PFE

1D
-1.61%
1M
-0.23%
YTD
6.34%
6M
2.75%
1Y
17.39%
3Y*
-7.47%
5Y*
-3.62%
10Y*
1.79%

NUKZ

1D
0.18%
1M
-6.54%
YTD
7.72%
6M
3.81%
1Y
31.62%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PFE vs. NUKZ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
6.34%0.65%-0.63%
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
7.72%56.57%62.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PFE and NUKZ is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2024

0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFE vs. NUKZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFE
PFE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
PFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFE Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
PFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

NUKZ
NUKZ Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
NUKZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUKZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUKZ Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
NUKZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUKZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFE vs. NUKZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pfizer Inc. (PFE) and Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFENUKZDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.19

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.92

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.11

4.79

-1.68

PFE vs. NUKZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFE Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the NUKZ Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFE and NUKZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFENUKZDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

1.05

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

1.63

-1.30

Drawdowns

PFE vs. NUKZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFE drawdown since its inception was -69.24%, which is greater than NUKZ's maximum drawdown of -33.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFE and NUKZ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PFENUKZDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.24%

-33.03%

-36.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.47%

-16.51%

+5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-46.90%

-10.27%

-36.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.89%

-6.02%

-16.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.61%

6.62%

-1.01%

Volatility

PFE vs. NUKZ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pfizer Inc. (PFE) is 4.78%, while Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF (NUKZ) has a volatility of 10.20%. This indicates that PFE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUKZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PFENUKZDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

10.20%

-5.42%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.74%

22.61%

-7.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.98%

30.26%

-6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.52%

32.82%

-7.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.89%

32.82%

-8.93%

Dividends

PFE vs. NUKZ - Dividend Comparison

PFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.71%, more than NUKZ's 0.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NUKZ
Range Nuclear Renaissance ETF
0.85%0.91%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PFE
Pfizer Inc.
6.71%6.91%6.33%5.70%3.12%2.64%3.92%3.68%3.12%3.53%3.69%3.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


PFE and NUKZ have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUKZ has higher volatility (10.20%) compared to PFE (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PFE dropped -69.24% vs NUKZ's -33.03%.

NUKZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.05 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PFE and NUKZ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer