PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PFBC vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PFBC vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Preferred Bank (PFBC) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PFBC vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PFBC
Preferred Bank
-2.09%13.23%22.73%1.55%6.50%45.63%-13.38%42.14%-25.14%13.72%
^GSPC
S&P 500 Index
-3.95%16.39%23.31%24.23%-19.44%26.89%16.26%28.88%-6.24%19.42%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PFBC achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.95% return. Over the past 10 years, PFBC has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 14.76%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 12.24% annualized return.


PFBC

1D
1.10%
1M
2.57%
YTD
-2.09%
6M
3.47%
1Y
13.24%
3Y*
23.14%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
14.76%

^GSPC

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-3.95%
6M
-2.02%
1Y
16.73%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*
12.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PFBC vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PFBC
PFBC Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PFBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFBC Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
PFBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFBC Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PFBC vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Preferred Bank (PFBC) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PFBC^GSPCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.47

0.92

-0.45

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.78

1.41

-0.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.21

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

1.41

-0.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.94

6.61

-4.68

PFBC vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PFBC Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PFBC and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PFBC^GSPCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

0.92

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.61

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.68

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.46

-0.38

Correlation

The correlation between PFBC and ^GSPC is 0.31, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Drawdowns

PFBC vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PFBC drawdown since its inception was -97.00%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PFBC and ^GSPC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PFBC^GSPCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.00%

-56.78%

-40.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.58%

-12.14%

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.73%

-25.43%

-18.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.18%

-33.92%

-23.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.81%

-5.78%

-35.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-55.20%

-10.75%

-44.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.96%

2.60%

+4.36%

Volatility

PFBC vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Preferred Bank (PFBC) is 4.55%, while S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that PFBC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PFBC^GSPCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

5.37%

-0.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.34%

9.55%

+10.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.47%

18.33%

+10.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.14%

16.90%

+12.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.20%

18.05%

+17.15%