PEZ vs. XRT
PEZ (Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF) and XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEZ is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while XRT is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P Retail Select Industry. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEZ returned 9.46%/yr vs 8.56%/yr for XRT. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEZ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XRT.
Performance
PEZ vs. XRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEZ achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly lower than XRT's -1.99% return. Over the past 10 years, PEZ has outperformed XRT with an annualized return of 9.46%, while XRT has yielded a comparatively lower 8.56% annualized return.
PEZ
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- 0.97%
- YTD
- -4.23%
- 6M
- -0.27%
- 1Y
- 5.43%
- 3Y*
- 14.83%
- 5Y*
- 2.63%
- 10Y*
- 9.46%
XRT
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- -1.99%
- 6M
- -2.00%
- 1Y
- 8.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.38%
- 5Y*
- -0.84%
- 10Y*
- 8.56%
PEZ vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF | -4.23% | 5.40% | 20.06% | 29.55% | -29.59% | 20.35% | 38.97% | 18.05% | -6.85% | 19.87% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | -1.99% | 8.07% | 11.78% | 21.53% | -31.64% | 42.60% | 41.91% | 14.12% | -8.04% | 4.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEZ and XRT is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006 | 0.79 |
The correlation between PEZ and XRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
PEZ vs. XRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEZ
XRT
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Technology
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
PEZ
XRT
Communication Services
PEZ
XRT
Consumer Defensive
PEZ
XRT
Healthcare
PEZ
XRT
Technology
PEZ
XRT
Industrials
PEZ
XRT
-
Real Estate
PEZ
XRT
-
Financial Services
PEZ
XRT
-
Basic Materials
PEZ
-
XRT
-
Energy
PEZ
-
XRT
Utilities
PEZ
-
XRT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEZ vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank
PEZ
XRT
PEZ vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEZ | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.08 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.34 | 0.63 | -0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.91 | 1.45 | -0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEZ | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 0.42 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | -0.03 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | 0.32 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.35 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
PEZ vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEZ drawdown since its inception was -58.39%, smaller than the maximum XRT drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEZ and XRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEZ | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.39% | -65.81% | +7.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.83% | -13.53% | -2.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.48% | -25.62% | -5.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.72% | -44.57% | +2.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.05% | -47.02% | -5.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.25% | -13.82% | +2.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.86% | -15.00% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.96% | 5.85% | +0.11% |
Volatility
PEZ vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) is 4.91%, while SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that PEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEZ | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.91% | 6.50% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.13% | 13.63% | +1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 20.42% | -0.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 26.90% | -2.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.06% | 27.16% | -2.10% |
PEZ vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEZ vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison
PEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than XRT's 0.83% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEZ Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF | 0.22% | 0.11% | 0.12% | 0.60% | 0.43% | 0.23% | 0.39% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 0.42% | 0.83% | 0.64% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 0.83% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.40% | 2.15% | 1.55% | 1.01% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.52% | 1.36% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEZ and XRT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XRT has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to PEZ (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEZ dropped -58.39% vs XRT's -65.81%.
On 10-year performance, PEZ leads with 9.46% vs 8.56% for XRT. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PEZ has performed better with a 9.46% return vs 8.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEZ.
XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.22% for PEZ.
PEZ is categorized as Momentum, while XRT is Consumer Discretionary Equities. PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PEZ and 0.35% for XRT.
XRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEZ and XRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer