PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEZ vs. XRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PEZ vs. XRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEZ achieves a -4.23% return, which is significantly lower than XRT's -1.99% return. Over the past 10 years, PEZ has outperformed XRT with an annualized return of 9.46%, while XRT has yielded a comparatively lower 8.56% annualized return.


PEZ

1D
0.45%
1M
0.97%
YTD
-4.23%
6M
-0.27%
1Y
5.43%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
2.63%
10Y*
9.46%

XRT

1D
-0.39%
1M
-0.29%
YTD
-1.99%
6M
-2.00%
1Y
8.44%
3Y*
13.38%
5Y*
-0.84%
10Y*
8.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEZ vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
-4.23%5.40%20.06%29.55%-29.59%20.35%38.97%18.05%-6.85%19.87%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
-1.99%8.07%11.78%21.53%-31.64%42.60%41.91%14.12%-8.04%4.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PEZ and XRT is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2006

0.79

The correlation between PEZ and XRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

PEZ vs. XRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PEZ
XRT

Consumer Cyclical

66.0%
73.6%

Communication Services

11.9%
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

8.7%
20.9%

Healthcare

6.9%
1.4%

Technology

4.0%
1.4%

Industrials

3.8%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Financial Services

0.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Energy

-

1.4%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

PEZ
66.0%
XRT
73.6%

Communication Services

PEZ
11.9%
XRT
1.4%

Consumer Defensive

PEZ
8.7%
XRT
20.9%

Healthcare

PEZ
6.9%
XRT
1.4%

Technology

PEZ
4.0%
XRT
1.4%

Industrials

PEZ
3.8%
XRT

-

Real Estate

PEZ
1.9%
XRT

-

Financial Services

PEZ
0.6%
XRT

-

Basic Materials

PEZ

-

XRT

-

Energy

PEZ

-

XRT
1.4%

Utilities

PEZ

-

XRT

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PEZ vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEZ
PEZ Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
PEZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PEZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

XRT
XRT Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRT Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRT Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEZ vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEZXRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.08

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

0.63

-0.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.91

1.45

-0.53

PEZ vs. XRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the XRT Sharpe Ratio of 0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEZ and XRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEZXRTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

0.42

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

-0.03

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.32

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.35

-0.02

Drawdowns

PEZ vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEZ drawdown since its inception was -58.39%, smaller than the maximum XRT drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEZ and XRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PEZXRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.39%

-65.81%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.83%

-13.53%

-2.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.48%

-25.62%

-5.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.72%

-44.57%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.05%

-47.02%

-5.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.25%

-13.82%

+2.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.86%

-15.00%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.96%

5.85%

+0.11%

Volatility

PEZ vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF (PEZ) is 4.91%, while SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) has a volatility of 6.50%. This indicates that PEZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PEZXRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.91%

6.50%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.13%

13.63%

+1.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.07%

20.42%

-0.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.48%

26.90%

-2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.06%

27.16%

-2.10%

PEZ vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEZ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PEZ vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison

PEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.22%, less than XRT's 0.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PEZ
Invesco DWA Consumer Cyclicals Momentum ETF
0.22%0.11%0.12%0.60%0.43%0.23%0.39%0.01%0.40%0.42%0.83%0.64%
XRT
SPDR S&P Retail ETF
0.83%0.77%1.52%1.40%2.15%1.55%1.01%1.57%1.51%1.52%1.36%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


PEZ and XRT have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XRT has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to PEZ (4.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEZ dropped -58.39% vs XRT's -65.81%.

On 10-year performance, PEZ leads with 9.46% vs 8.56% for XRT. On fees, XRT is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PEZ has been the lower-risk option at 4.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PEZ has performed better with a 9.46% return vs 8.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XRT is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PEZ.

XRT has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.22% for PEZ.

PEZ is categorized as Momentum, while XRT is Consumer Discretionary Equities. PEZ tracks DWA Consumer Cyclicals Technical Leaders Index, while XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PEZ and 0.35% for XRT.

XRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.42 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PEZ and XRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer