PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PEXL vs. QDPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PEXL vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PEXL vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PEXL
Pacer US Export Leaders ETF
-3.74%27.33%5.79%24.40%-20.41%11.68%
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
-4.29%16.52%22.83%23.66%-16.25%8.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEXL achieves a -3.74% return, which is significantly higher than QDPL's -4.29% return.


PEXL

1D
3.54%
1M
-6.91%
YTD
-3.74%
6M
2.59%
1Y
29.20%
3Y*
12.71%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*

QDPL

1D
2.81%
1M
-4.61%
YTD
-4.29%
6M
-1.77%
1Y
15.55%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PEXL vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PEXL and QDPL have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Return for Risk

PEXL vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEXL
PEXL Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
PEXL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEXL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEXL Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PEXL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEXL Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

QDPL
QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEXL vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PEXLQDPLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

0.87

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.74

1.34

+0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.20

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.81

1.37

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.35

6.60

+1.75

PEXL vs. QDPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEXL Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the QDPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEXL and QDPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PEXLQDPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

0.87

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.63

-0.12

Correlation

The correlation between PEXL and QDPL is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PEXL vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison

PEXL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than QDPL's 5.13% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PEXL
Pacer US Export Leaders ETF
0.43%0.44%0.48%0.48%0.60%0.22%0.48%0.49%0.29%
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
5.13%4.84%5.43%6.30%7.27%2.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PEXL vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEXL drawdown since its inception was -36.76%, which is greater than QDPL's maximum drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEXL and QDPL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PEXLQDPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.76%

-22.59%

-14.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.20%

-11.94%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.30%

-6.08%

-2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.85%

-5.30%

-1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

2.48%

+1.03%

Volatility

PEXL vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison

Pacer US Export Leaders ETF (PEXL) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) at 5.30%. This indicates that PEXL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PEXLQDPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

5.30%

+1.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.74%

9.39%

+4.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.05%

18.01%

+7.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.77%

15.12%

+6.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.14%

15.12%

+9.02%