PEX vs. XLF
PEX (ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both Financials Equities funds - PEX tracks the LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index while XLF tracks the Financial Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEX returned 4.13%/yr vs 12.38%/yr for XLF. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEX charges 3.13%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLF.
Performance
PEX vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEX achieves a -12.48% return, which is significantly lower than XLF's -6.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PEX has underperformed XLF with an annualized return of 4.13%, while XLF has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.
PEX
- 1D
- -2.88%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- -12.48%
- 6M
- -10.90%
- 1Y
- -12.90%
- 3Y*
- 3.61%
- 5Y*
- -1.12%
- 10Y*
- 4.13%
XLF
- 1D
- -1.15%
- 1M
- -1.38%
- YTD
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -4.18%
- 1Y
- 1.13%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.61%
- 10Y*
- 12.38%
PEX vs. XLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | -12.48% | 0.21% | 13.05% | 23.11% | -25.98% | 28.34% | -1.14% | 25.53% | -13.31% | 14.33% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | -6.64% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -13.06% | 22.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEX and XLF is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2013 | 0.54 |
The correlation between PEX and XLF shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (all time) to 0.67 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PEX vs. XLF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEX
XLF
Financial Services
Industrials
Healthcare
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
PEX
XLF
Industrials
PEX
XLF
Healthcare
PEX
XLF
-
Basic Materials
PEX
XLF
-
Communication Services
PEX
-
XLF
-
Consumer Cyclical
PEX
-
XLF
-
Consumer Defensive
PEX
-
XLF
-
Energy
PEX
-
XLF
-
Real Estate
PEX
-
XLF
-
Technology
PEX
-
XLF
Utilities
PEX
-
XLF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEX vs. XLF — Risk / Return Rank
PEX
XLF
PEX vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEX | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 1.02 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 0.08 | -0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 0.20 | -1.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEX | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | 0.08 | -0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.06 | 0.41 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.56 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.20 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
PEX vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEX drawdown since its inception was -49.17%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEX and XLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEX | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.17% | -82.69% | +33.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.72% | -14.79% | -9.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.72% | -15.54% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.58% | -25.81% | -10.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.17% | -42.86% | -6.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.90% | -9.34% | -11.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.21% | -20.03% | +11.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.22% | 5.66% | +6.56% |
Volatility
PEX vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF (PEX) has a higher volatility of 4.81% compared to State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) at 3.29%. This indicates that PEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEX | XLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.81% | 3.29% | +1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.05% | 10.94% | +2.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.61% | 14.41% | +1.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.96% | 18.63% | -0.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.44% | 22.16% | -2.72% |
PEX vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEX has a 3.13% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEX vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
PEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.81%, more than XLF's 1.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEX ProShares Global Listed Private Equity ETF | 12.81% | 12.80% | 14.11% | 13.02% | 1.77% | 13.64% | 5.52% | 7.94% | 4.72% | 24.26% | 3.24% | 12.50% |
XLF State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.56% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEX and XLF have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEX has higher volatility (4.81%) compared to XLF (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEX dropped -49.17% vs XLF's -82.69%.
On 10-year performance, XLF leads with 12.38% vs 4.13% for PEX. On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLF has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLF has performed better with a 12.38% return vs 4.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 3.13% for PEX.
PEX has the higher dividend yield at 12.81%, compared with 1.56% for XLF.
PEX tracks LPX Direct Listed Private Equity Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 3.13% for PEX and 0.08% for XLF.
XLF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.08 vs -0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEX and XLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer