PEVC vs. ENFR

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

PEVC (Pacer PE/VC ETF) and ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEVC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the FTSE PE/VC Index, while ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PEVC returned 20.02% vs 28.68% for ENFR. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PEVC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for ENFR.

Performance

PEVC vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer PE/VC ETF (PEVC) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEVC achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly lower than ENFR's 26.07% return.

PEVC

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: 4.68%
• 6M: 6.36%
• YTD: 9.05%
• 1Y: 20.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ENFR

• 1D: -0.77%
• 1M: 0.80%
• 6M: 27.71%
• YTD: 26.07%
• 1Y: 28.68%
• 3Y*: 27.13%
• 5Y*: 20.42%
• 10Y*: 11.57%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEVC vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PEVC Pacer PE/VC ETF	9.05%	18.18%
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	26.07%	2.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PEVC and ENFR is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2025	0.13

The correlation between PEVC and ENFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PEVC vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEVC

PEVC Risk / Return Rank: 36
PEVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
PEVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
PEVC Omega Ratio Rank: 33
PEVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
PEVC Martin Ratio Rank: 40

ENFR

ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 73
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 70
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEVC vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer PE/VC ETF (PEVC) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PEVC	ENFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	1.95	-0.90
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.50	2.71	-1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.33	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.45	3.39	-1.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.92	8.36	-3.44

PEVC vs. ENFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEVC Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the ENFR Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEVC and ENFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PEVC vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEVC drawdown since its inception was -28.92%, smaller than the maximum ENFR drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEVC and ENFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEVC	ENFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.92%	-68.28%	+39.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.97%	-8.64%	-4.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.58%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-20.29%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.64%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.65%	-3.84%	+1.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.47%	-15.89%	+11.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.82%	3.50%	+0.32%

Volatility

PEVC vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison

Pacer PE/VC ETF (PEVC) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) have volatilities of 5.57% and 5.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PEVC	ENFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.57%	5.61%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.69%	11.96%	+1.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.96%	15.06%	+2.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.38%	19.27%	+7.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.38%	24.65%	+1.73%

PEVC vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEVC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEVC vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison

PEVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.22%, more than ENFR's 3.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF	3.98%	4.77%	4.41%	5.48%	5.23%	7.86%	7.57%	5.81%	3.98%	2.98%	3.31%	3.34%
PEVC Pacer PE/VC ETF	4.22%	4.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEVC and ENFR in my portfolio?

PEVC and ENFR have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PEVC or ENFR?

ENFR has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to PEVC (5.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEVC dropped -28.92% vs ENFR's -68.28%.

Which ETF is better, PEVC or ENFR?

On 1-year performance, ENFR leads with 28.68% vs 20.02% for PEVC. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PEVC or ENFR?

Over the 1-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 28.68% return vs 20.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PEVC or ENFR?

ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEVC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PEVC or ENFR?

PEVC has the higher dividend yield at 4.22%, compared with 3.98% for ENFR.

What is the main difference between PEVC and ENFR?

PEVC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ENFR is Energy Equities. PEVC tracks FTSE PE/VC Index, while ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PEVC and 0.35% for ENFR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.