PEVC vs. BPH

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

PEVC (Pacer PE/VC ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEVC is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the FTSE PE/VC Index, while BPH is a Oil & Gas fund actively managed by Precidian. PEVC is passively managed, while BPH is actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PEVC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

PEVC vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer PE/VC ETF (PEVC) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PEVC

• 1D: -3.46%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 5.73%
• 6M: 5.24%
• 1Y: 22.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BPH

• 1D: -1.59%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEVC vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PEVC Pacer PE/VC ETF	-2.42%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between PEVC and BPH is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 27, 2026	0.05

PEVC vs. BPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PEVC	BPH
Technology	38.0%	-
Communication Services	14.9%	-
Financial Services	12.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	-
Industrials	7.3%	-
Healthcare	6.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	6.0%	-
Energy	2.6%	100.0%
Basic Materials	2.4%	-
Utilities	1.1%	-
Real Estate	0.3%	-

Return for Risk

PEVC vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEVC

PEVC Risk / Return Rank: 38
PEVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PEVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
PEVC Omega Ratio Rank: 35
PEVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PEVC Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEVC vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer PE/VC ETF (PEVC) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PEVC	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.60	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PEVC	BPH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	2.77	-2.09

Drawdowns

PEVC vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEVC drawdown since its inception was -28.92%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -2.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEVC and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEVC	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.92%	-2.35%	-26.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.61%	-1.59%	-4.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.40%	-1.01%	-3.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PEVC	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.70%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.15%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.99%	24.64%	-6.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.88%	24.64%	+2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.88%	24.64%	+2.24%

PEVC vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEVC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEVC vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

PEVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, while BPH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%
PEVC Pacer PE/VC ETF	4.35%	4.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEVC and BPH in my portfolio?

PEVC and BPH have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PEVC or BPH?

On fees, BPH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PEVC or BPH?

BPH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEVC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PEVC or BPH?

PEVC has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 0.00% for BPH.

What is the main difference between PEVC and BPH?

PEVC is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BPH is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PEVC and 0.19% for BPH.