PEVC vs. BIBL

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

PEVC (Pacer PE/VC ETF) and BIBL (Inspire 100 ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - PEVC tracks the FTSE PE/VC Index while BIBL tracks the Inspire 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PEVC returned 22.30% vs 36.38% for BIBL. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEVC charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BIBL.

Performance

PEVC vs. BIBL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer PE/VC ETF (PEVC) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEVC achieves a 5.73% return, which is significantly lower than BIBL's 20.10% return.

PEVC

• 1D: -3.46%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 5.73%
• 6M: 5.24%
• 1Y: 22.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BIBL

• 1D: -3.23%
• 1M: 0.73%
• YTD: 20.10%
• 6M: 18.49%
• 1Y: 36.38%
• 3Y*: 20.92%
• 5Y*: 9.44%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEVC vs. BIBL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PEVC Pacer PE/VC ETF	5.73%	18.18%
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	20.10%	11.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PEVC and BIBL is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025	0.78

The correlation between PEVC and BIBL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

PEVC vs. BIBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PEVC	BIBL
Technology	38.0%	30.1%
Communication Services	14.9%	-
Financial Services	12.7%	8.3%
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	0.3%
Industrials	7.3%	26.8%
Healthcare	6.0%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	6.0%	0.5%
Energy	2.6%	6.9%
Basic Materials	2.4%	4.2%
Utilities	1.1%	3.5%
Real Estate	0.3%	14.7%

Return for Risk

PEVC vs. BIBL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEVC

PEVC Risk / Return Rank: 38
PEVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PEVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
PEVC Omega Ratio Rank: 35
PEVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PEVC Martin Ratio Rank: 44

BIBL

BIBL Risk / Return Rank: 77
BIBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
BIBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
BIBL Omega Ratio Rank: 71
BIBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
BIBL Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEVC vs. BIBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer PE/VC ETF (PEVC) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PEVC	BIBL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	2.31	-1.06
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	3.09	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.40	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.73	4.09	-2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.60	17.62	-11.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PEVC vs. BIBL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEVC Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the BIBL Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEVC and BIBL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PEVC	BIBL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	2.31	-1.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.68	0.61	+0.07

Drawdowns

PEVC vs. BIBL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEVC drawdown since its inception was -28.92%, smaller than the maximum BIBL drawdown of -36.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEVC and BIBL.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEVC	BIBL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.92%	-36.12%	+7.20%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.97%	-8.94%	-4.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.60%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.85%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.61%	-3.23%	-2.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.40%	-7.04%	+2.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.39%	2.07%	+1.32%

Volatility

PEVC vs. BIBL - Volatility Comparison

Pacer PE/VC ETF (PEVC) and Inspire 100 ETF (BIBL) have volatilities of 5.70% and 5.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PEVC	BIBL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.70%	5.71%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.15%	13.07%	+0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.99%	15.82%	+2.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.88%	19.63%	+7.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.88%	21.10%	+5.78%

PEVC vs. BIBL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEVC has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBL's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEVC vs. BIBL - Dividend Comparison

PEVC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than BIBL's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
BIBL Inspire 100 ETF	0.98%	1.01%	0.92%	1.02%	0.98%	17.87%	1.67%	1.30%	1.49%	0.31%
PEVC Pacer PE/VC ETF	4.35%	4.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEVC and BIBL in my portfolio?

PEVC and BIBL have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PEVC or BIBL?

BIBL has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to PEVC (5.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEVC dropped -28.92% vs BIBL's -36.12%.

Which ETF is better, PEVC or BIBL?

On 1-year performance, BIBL leads with 36.38% vs 22.30% for PEVC. On fees, BIBL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PEVC or BIBL?

Over the 1-year period, BIBL has performed better with a 36.38% return vs 22.30%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PEVC or BIBL?

BIBL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEVC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PEVC or BIBL?

PEVC has the higher dividend yield at 4.35%, compared with 0.98% for BIBL.

What is the main difference between PEVC and BIBL?

PEVC tracks FTSE PE/VC Index, while BIBL tracks Inspire 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Inspire. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PEVC and 0.35% for BIBL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BIBL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.