PEP vs. GWW
PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) and GWW (W.W. Grainger, Inc.) are both stocks. PEP operates in Beverages - Non-Alcoholic (Consumer Defensive), while GWW operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, PEP returned 5.54%/yr vs 21.39%/yr for GWW. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PEP vs. GWW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEP achieves a -2.41% return, which is significantly lower than GWW's 36.88% return. Over the past 10 years, PEP has underperformed GWW with an annualized return of 5.54%, while GWW has yielded a comparatively higher 21.39% annualized return.
PEP
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- -4.42%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- YTD
- -2.41%
- 1Y
- 5.59%
- 3Y*
- -6.06%
- 5Y*
- 1.49%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
GWW
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 4.70%
- 6M
- 34.12%
- YTD
- 36.88%
- 1Y
- 30.98%
- 3Y*
- 21.06%
- 5Y*
- 25.95%
- 10Y*
- 21.39%
PEP vs. GWW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | -2.41% | -1.85% | -7.60% | -3.29% | 6.78% | 20.56% | 11.67% | 27.38% | -4.81% | 17.82% |
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 36.88% | -3.41% | 28.21% | 50.53% | 8.75% | 28.80% | 22.85% | 22.25% | 21.69% | 4.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEP and GWW is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 1984 | 0.27 |
The correlation between PEP and GWW shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PEP:
$187.77B
GWW:
$64.95B
PEP:
$7.65
GWW:
$37.36
PEP:
17.96
GWW:
36.83
PEP:
6.21
GWW:
2.13
PEP:
1.94
GWW:
3.57
PEP:
8.51
GWW:
16.59
PEP:
$96.90B
GWW:
$18.38B
PEP:
$52.29B
GWW:
$7.20B
PEP:
$18.40B
GWW:
$2.82B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEP vs. GWW — Risk / Return Rank
PEP
GWW
PEP vs. GWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PEP | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.26 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | 2.44 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.66 | 5.00 | -4.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PEP vs. GWW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEP drawdown since its inception was -73.92%, which is greater than GWW's maximum drawdown of -56.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEP and GWW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEP | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.92% | -56.73% | -17.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.03% | -13.35% | -5.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.17% | -24.50% | -4.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.32% | -24.50% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.32% | -41.60% | +11.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -21.68% | 0.00% | -21.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.65% | -10.99% | -2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.57% | 6.51% | +1.06% |
Volatility
PEP vs. GWW - Volatility Comparison
PepsiCo, Inc. (PEP) has a higher volatility of 8.41% compared to W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) at 6.81%. This indicates that PEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEP | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.41% | 6.81% | +1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.30% | 18.22% | -1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.58% | 25.13% | -2.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 24.71% | -6.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.79% | 28.53% | -8.74% |
Dividends
PEP vs. GWW - Dividend Comparison
PEP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.18%, more than GWW's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.76% | 0.88% | 1.22% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 2.27% |
PEP PepsiCo, Inc. | 4.18% | 3.92% | 3.51% | 2.91% | 2.50% | 2.45% | 2.71% | 2.77% | 3.25% | 2.64% | 2.83% | 2.76% |
Financials
PEP vs. GWW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PepsiCo, Inc. and W.W. Grainger, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PEP vs. GWW - Profitability Comparison
PEP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.11B and revenue of 24.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 54.2%.
GWW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.
PEP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported an operating income of 4.02B and revenue of 24.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.6%.
GWW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 793.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.
PEP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PepsiCo, Inc. reported a net income of 3.00B and revenue of 24.18B, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.
GWW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PEP and GWW have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEP has higher volatility (8.41%) compared to GWW (6.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEP dropped -73.92% vs GWW's -56.73%.
GWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEP and GWW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer