PENNX vs. SCHA
PENNX (Royce Pennsylvania Mutual Fund) and SCHA (Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PENNX returned 12.48%/yr vs 11.73%/yr for SCHA. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PENNX charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHA.
Performance
PENNX vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PENNX achieves a 20.13% return, which is significantly lower than SCHA's 22.67% return. Over the past 10 years, PENNX has outperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 12.48%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively lower 11.73% annualized return.
PENNX
- 1D
- -1.33%
- 1M
- 4.13%
- YTD
- 20.13%
- 6M
- 17.34%
- 1Y
- 33.32%
- 3Y*
- 17.12%
- 5Y*
- 8.86%
- 10Y*
- 12.48%
SCHA
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 4.68%
- YTD
- 22.67%
- 6M
- 19.77%
- 1Y
- 40.05%
- 3Y*
- 19.89%
- 5Y*
- 7.22%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
PENNX vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PENNX Royce Pennsylvania Mutual Fund | 20.13% | 9.02% | 7.02% | 26.82% | -17.18% | 21.49% | 14.11% | 26.61% | -9.94% | 16.00% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 22.67% | 11.60% | 11.16% | 18.46% | -19.81% | 16.45% | 19.34% | 26.50% | -11.79% | 14.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between PENNX and SCHA is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009 | 0.97 |
The correlation between PENNX and SCHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PENNX vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank
PENNX
SCHA
PENNX vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Pennsylvania Mutual Fund (PENNX) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PENNX | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.36 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 4.23 | -0.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.01 | 15.49 | -3.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PENNX vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PENNX drawdown since its inception was -57.00%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PENNX and SCHA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PENNX | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.00% | -42.41% | -14.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.21% | -9.50% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.42% | -27.29% | +0.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.58% | -30.79% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.10% | -42.41% | +1.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -1.61% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.39% | -7.56% | -1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.92% | 2.59% | +0.33% |
Volatility
PENNX vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Royce Pennsylvania Mutual Fund (PENNX) is 5.51%, while Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) has a volatility of 6.71%. This indicates that PENNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PENNX | SCHA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.51% | 6.71% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.57% | 13.91% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.35% | 18.75% | -0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.79% | 22.04% | -1.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 22.75% | -1.18% |
PENNX vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PENNX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
PENNX vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison
PENNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%, more than SCHA's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PENNX Royce Pennsylvania Mutual Fund | 5.58% | 6.70% | 9.35% | 4.91% | 5.19% | 28.20% | 5.05% | 3.85% | 23.68% | 21.27% | 7.15% | 23.31% |
SCHA Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF | 0.98% | 1.26% | 1.51% | 1.42% | 1.37% | 1.19% | 1.05% | 1.39% | 1.58% | 1.24% | 1.50% | 1.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, PENNX and SCHA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SCHA has higher volatility (6.71%) compared to PENNX (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PENNX dropped -57.00% vs SCHA's -42.41%.
SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PENNX and SCHA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer