PENNX vs. PNSAX

In the year-to-date period, PENNX achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly lower than PNSAX's 24.40% return. Over the past 10 years, PENNX has underperformed PNSAX with an annualized return of -3.29%, while PNSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.66% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

PENNX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than PNSAX's 1.23% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Royce Pennsylvania Mutual Fund (PENNX) and Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PENNX Sharpe Ratio is 0.04, which is lower than the PNSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PENNX and PNSAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither PENNX nor PNSAX has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum PENNX drawdown since its inception was -61.83%, roughly equal to the maximum PNSAX drawdown of -61.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PENNX and PNSAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Royce Pennsylvania Mutual Fund (PENNX) has a higher volatility of 10.26% compared to Putnam Small Cap Growth Fund (PNSAX) at 5.60%. This indicates that PENNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PNSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.