PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PENG vs. CRDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PENG vs. CRDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PENG achieves a 227.86% return, which is significantly higher than CRDO's 74.31% return.


PENG

1D
-0.31%
1M
29.71%
YTD
227.86%
6M
207.73%
1Y
232.62%
3Y*
35.71%
5Y*
22.00%
10Y*

CRDO

1D
-5.27%
1M
35.91%
YTD
74.31%
6M
74.28%
1Y
241.28%
3Y*
142.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PENG vs. CRDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PENG
Penguin Solutions, Inc
227.86%1.93%1.37%27.22%-47.01%
CRDO
Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd
74.31%114.09%245.20%46.28%10.00%

Correlation

The correlation between PENG and CRDO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2022

0.48

Fundamentals

EPS

PENG:

$1.50

CRDO:

$2.50

PE Ratio

PENG:

42.83

CRDO:

100.50

PEG Ratio

PENG:

19.22

CRDO:

0.09

PS Ratio

PENG:

1.73

CRDO:

35.55

Total Revenue (TTM)

PENG:

$1.35B

CRDO:

$1.34B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PENG:

$381.14M

CRDO:

$908.35M

EBITDA (TTM)

PENG:

$82.22M

CRDO:

$463.79M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PENG vs. CRDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PENG
PENG Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PENG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PENG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
PENG Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
PENG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
PENG Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

CRDO
CRDO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CRDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRDO Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CRDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRDO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PENG vs. CRDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PENGCRDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.35

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.97

4.46

+0.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.56

10.76

-1.20

PENG vs. CRDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PENG Sharpe Ratio is 3.49, which is comparable to the CRDO Sharpe Ratio of 2.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PENG and CRDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PENG vs. CRDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PENG drawdown since its inception was -68.72%, which is greater than CRDO's maximum drawdown of -62.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PENG and CRDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PENGCRDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.72%

-62.04%

-6.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.57%

-53.59%

+9.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.84%

-61.05%

+6.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.19%

-5.27%

-4.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.35%

-19.38%

-17.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.14%

22.17%

+0.97%

Volatility

PENG vs. CRDO - Volatility Comparison

Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) has a higher volatility of 31.44% compared to Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd (CRDO) at 28.41%. This indicates that PENG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PENGCRDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

31.44%

28.41%

+3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.45%

65.16%

-12.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.52%

85.70%

-22.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

59.51%

81.50%

-21.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.70%

81.50%

-18.80%

Dividends

PENG vs. CRDO - Dividend Comparison

Neither PENG nor CRDO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

PENG vs. CRDO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Penguin Solutions, Inc and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
343.00M
437.00M
(PENG) Total Revenue
(CRDO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PENG vs. CRDO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Penguin Solutions, Inc and Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
27.3%
68.2%
Portfolio components
PENG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Penguin Solutions, Inc reported a gross profit of 93.70M and revenue of 343.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.

CRDO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a gross profit of 298.07M and revenue of 437.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.2%.

PENG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Penguin Solutions, Inc reported an operating income of 25.69M and revenue of 343.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.

CRDO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported an operating income of 155.85M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.7%.

PENG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Penguin Solutions, Inc reported a net income of 37.45M and revenue of 343.00M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

CRDO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Credo Technology Group Holding Ltd reported a net income of 169.10M and revenue of 437.00M, resulting in a net margin of 38.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PENG and CRDO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PENG has higher volatility (31.44%) compared to CRDO (28.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PENG dropped -68.72% vs CRDO's -62.04%.

PENG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 2.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PENG and CRDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer