PENG vs. URA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA).

URA is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Solactive Global Uranium & Nuclear Components Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2010.

Performance

PENG vs. URA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PENG vs. URA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PENG Penguin Solutions, Inc	-10.02%	1.93%	1.37%	27.22%	-58.08%	88.65%	-0.82%	27.74%	-11.87%	150.56%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	13.34%	67.18%	-0.58%	46.25%	-11.32%	57.57%	41.33%	-3.54%	-22.11%	16.38%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PENG achieves a -10.02% return, which is significantly lower than URA's 13.34% return.

PENG

• 1D: 8.37%
• 1M: -15.30%
• YTD: -10.02%
• 6M: -33.03%
• 1Y: 1.32%
• 3Y*: 0.69%
• 5Y*: -6.23%
• 10Y*: —

URA

• 1D: 6.93%
• 1M: -10.88%
• YTD: 13.34%
• 6M: 6.44%
• 1Y: 121.39%
• 3Y*: 40.54%
• 5Y*: 24.65%
• 10Y*: 16.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PENG vs. URA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PENG

PENG Risk / Return Rank: 41
PENG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
PENG Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
PENG Omega Ratio Rank: 40
PENG Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
PENG Martin Ratio Rank: 41

URA

URA Risk / Return Rank: 93
URA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
URA Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
URA Omega Ratio Rank: 90
URA Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
URA Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PENG vs. URA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) and Global X Uranium ETF (URA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PENG	URA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.02	2.48	-2.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.41	2.97	-2.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.37	-0.31
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.02	4.21	-4.19
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.04	10.13	-10.09
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PENG vs. URA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PENG Sharpe Ratio is 0.02, which is lower than the URA Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PENG and URA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PENG	URA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.02	2.48	-2.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.11	0.58	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.44	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.19	-0.06	+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between PENG and URA is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PENG vs. URA - Dividend Comparison

PENG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.30%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PENG Penguin Solutions, Inc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
URA Global X Uranium ETF	4.30%	4.88%	2.86%	6.07%	0.76%	5.84%	1.69%	1.66%	0.44%	2.03%	7.28%	1.96%

Drawdowns

PENG vs. URA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PENG drawdown since its inception was -68.72%, smaller than the maximum URA drawdown of -93.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PENG and URA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PENG	URA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.72%	-93.54%	+24.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.57%	-28.43%	-16.14%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-65.40%	-37.90%	-27.50%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-61.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-51.78%	-45.04%	-6.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.88%	-75.40%	+37.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.69%	11.82%	+10.87%

Volatility

PENG vs. URA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) is 14.80%, while Global X Uranium ETF (URA) has a volatility of 16.31%. This indicates that PENG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than URA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PENG	URA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.80%	16.31%	-1.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.07%	38.54%	+2.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.29%	49.21%	+4.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	56.91%	43.00%	+13.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.44%	37.23%	+24.21%