PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PENG vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PENG vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PENG achieves a 265.08% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 278.41% return.


PENG

1D
1.08%
1M
120.40%
YTD
265.08%
6M
232.45%
1Y
271.15%
3Y*
46.01%
5Y*
24.48%
10Y*

MU

1D
1.45%
1M
87.28%
YTD
278.41%
6M
361.42%
1Y
958.34%
3Y*
150.98%
5Y*
67.58%
10Y*
56.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PENG vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PENG
Penguin Solutions, Inc
265.08%1.93%1.37%27.22%-58.08%88.65%-0.82%27.74%-11.87%150.56%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
278.41%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-22.84%41.84%

Correlation

The correlation between PENG and MU is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2017

0.57

The correlation between PENG and MU shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

PENG:

$1.50

MU:

$21.26

PE Ratio

PENG:

47.69

MU:

50.79

PEG Ratio

PENG:

21.40

MU:

0.19

PS Ratio

PENG:

1.93

MU:

21.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

PENG:

$1.35B

MU:

$58.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PENG:

$381.14M

MU:

$33.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

PENG:

$82.22M

MU:

$25.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PENG vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PENG
PENG Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
PENG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PENG Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PENG Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PENG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PENG Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PENG vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PENGMUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.57

14.69

-10.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.25

7.32

-3.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.94

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

6.13

31.98

-25.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.82

126.47

-114.65

PENG vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PENG Sharpe Ratio is 4.57, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 14.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PENG and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PENGMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.57

14.69

-10.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

1.30

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.31

+0.17

Drawdowns

PENG vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PENG drawdown since its inception was -68.72%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PENG and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PENGMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.72%

-98.25%

+29.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-44.57%

-30.28%

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.84%

-57.63%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.40%

-57.63%

-7.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.44%

-58.20%

+20.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.05%

7.64%

+15.41%

Volatility

PENG vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) is 25.39%, while Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) has a volatility of 28.51%. This indicates that PENG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PENGMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.39%

28.51%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.40%

53.48%

-6.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.99%

66.00%

-6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

58.80%

52.31%

+6.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.27%

49.66%

+12.61%

Dividends

PENG vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

PENG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%
PENG
Penguin Solutions, Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PENG vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Penguin Solutions, Inc and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
343.00M
23.86B
(PENG) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PENG vs. MU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Penguin Solutions, Inc and Micron Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
27.3%
74.4%
Portfolio components
PENG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Penguin Solutions, Inc reported a gross profit of 93.70M and revenue of 343.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.3%.

MU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 17.75B and revenue of 23.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.4%.

PENG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Penguin Solutions, Inc reported an operating income of 25.69M and revenue of 343.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.5%.

MU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 16.13B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 67.6%.

PENG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Penguin Solutions, Inc reported a net income of 37.45M and revenue of 343.00M, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

MU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 13.79B and revenue of 23.86B, resulting in a net margin of 57.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PENG and MU have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MU has higher volatility (28.51%) compared to PENG (25.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PENG dropped -68.72% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.69 vs 4.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PENG and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer