PENG vs. MU
PENG (Penguin Solutions, Inc) and MU (Micron Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — PENG in Information Technology Services, MU in Semiconductors. Over the past 5 years, PENG returned 22.90%/yr vs 65.03%/yr for MU. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PENG vs. MU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PENG achieves a 294.73% return, which is significantly higher than MU's 228.49% return.
PENG
- 1D
- -1.46%
- 1M
- 20.40%
- 6M
- 298.19%
- YTD
- 294.73%
- 1Y
- 220.37%
- 3Y*
- 41.47%
- 5Y*
- 22.90%
- 10Y*
- —
MU
- 1D
- -4.32%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- 6M
- 171.07%
- YTD
- 228.49%
- 1Y
- 653.64%
- 3Y*
- 145.44%
- 5Y*
- 65.03%
- 10Y*
- 53.62%
PENG vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PENG Penguin Solutions, Inc | 294.73% | 1.93% | 1.37% | 27.22% | -58.08% | 88.65% | -0.82% | 27.74% | -11.87% | 180.83% |
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 228.49% | 240.24% | -0.96% | 71.93% | -45.93% | 24.21% | 39.79% | 69.49% | -22.84% | 45.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between PENG and MU is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017 | 0.57 |
The correlation between PENG and MU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
PENG:
$3.96B
MU:
$1.06T
PENG:
$0.24
MU:
$44.42
PENG:
321.74
MU:
21.10
PENG:
144.38
MU:
0.08
PENG:
2.09
MU:
11.79
PENG:
$1.50B
MU:
$90.27B
PENG:
$419.76M
MU:
$65.51B
PENG:
$125.18M
MU:
$44.96B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PENG vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank
PENG
MU
PENG vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PENG | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.66 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.95 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.67 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.98 | 21.79 | -16.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.50 | 79.32 | -69.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PENG vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PENG drawdown since its inception was -68.72%, smaller than the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PENG and MU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PENG | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.72% | -98.25% | +29.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.57% | -30.28% | -14.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.96% | -57.63% | +5.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -65.40% | -57.63% | -7.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -57.63% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.14% | -22.78% | +17.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.11% | -58.07% | +20.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.30% | 8.55% | +14.75% |
Volatility
PENG vs. MU - Volatility Comparison
Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) has a higher volatility of 38.50% compared to Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) at 33.57%. This indicates that PENG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PENG | MU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.50% | 33.57% | +4.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.91% | 62.25% | -1.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 73.31% | 76.01% | -2.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 61.34% | 54.80% | +6.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.74% | 50.67% | +13.07% |
Dividends
PENG vs. MU - Dividend Comparison
PENG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MU Micron Technology, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.16% | 0.55% | 0.54% | 0.89% | 0.21% |
PENG Penguin Solutions, Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PENG vs. MU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Penguin Solutions, Inc and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
PENG vs. MU - Profitability Comparison
PENG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Penguin Solutions, Inc reported a gross profit of 133.70M and revenue of 478.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.9%.
MU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 35.06B and revenue of 41.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.6%.
PENG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Penguin Solutions, Inc reported an operating income of 50.86M and revenue of 478.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.
MU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of 33.31B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 80.4%.
PENG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Penguin Solutions, Inc reported a net income of -42.17M and revenue of 478.71M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.
MU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Micron Technology, Inc. reported a net income of 28.24B and revenue of 41.46B, resulting in a net margin of 68.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
PENG and MU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PENG has higher volatility (38.50%) compared to MU (33.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PENG dropped -68.72% vs MU's -98.25%.
MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.70 vs 3.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PENG and MU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer