PENG vs. BBP

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PENG (Penguin Solutions, Inc) is a stock, while BBP (Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF) is Health & Biotech Equities fund tracking the LifeSci Biotechnology Products Index. Over the past 5 years, PENG returned 21.48%/yr vs 13.75%/yr for BBP. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PENG vs. BBP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) and Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PENG achieves a 237.42% return, which is significantly higher than BBP's 21.28% return.

PENG

• 1D: -9.40%
• 1M: 9.31%
• 6M: 229.83%
• YTD: 237.42%
• 1Y: 167.96%
• 3Y*: 34.49%
• 5Y*: 21.48%
• 10Y*: —

BBP

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 10.69%
• 6M: 20.79%
• YTD: 21.28%
• 1Y: 55.80%
• 3Y*: 21.53%
• 5Y*: 13.75%
• 10Y*: 12.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PENG vs. BBP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PENG Penguin Solutions, Inc	237.42%	1.93%	1.37%	27.22%	-58.08%	88.65%	-0.82%	27.74%	-11.87%	180.83%
BBP Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF	21.28%	33.15%	3.32%	17.88%	0.85%	-8.17%	22.24%	24.73%	-13.95%	11.85%

Correlation

The correlation between PENG and BBP is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017	0.37

The correlation between PENG and BBP shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (1 year) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PENG vs. BBP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PENG

PENG Risk / Return Rank: 90
PENG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
PENG Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
PENG Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PENG Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PENG Martin Ratio Rank: 85

BBP

BBP Risk / Return Rank: 89
BBP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
BBP Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
BBP Omega Ratio Rank: 81
BBP Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
BBP Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PENG vs. BBP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) and Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PENG	BBP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	2.33	-0.05
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	3.20	-0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.38	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.79	6.04	-2.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.23	18.30	-11.07

PENG vs. BBP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PENG Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is comparable to the BBP Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PENG and BBP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PENG vs. BBP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PENG drawdown since its inception was -68.72%, which is greater than BBP's maximum drawdown of -44.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PENG and BBP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PENG	BBP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.72%	-44.32%	-24.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.57%	-9.28%	-35.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.48%	-26.09%	-25.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-65.40%	-37.77%	-27.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.91%	-6.46%	-12.45%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-37.07%	-11.92%	-25.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	23.34%	3.06%	+20.28%

Volatility

PENG vs. BBP - Volatility Comparison

Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) has a higher volatility of 39.67% compared to Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF (BBP) at 7.67%. This indicates that PENG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PENG	BBP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	39.67%	7.67%	+32.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	62.13%	19.26%	+42.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	74.14%	24.09%	+50.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.46%	26.45%	+35.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.82%	27.36%	+36.46%

Dividends

PENG vs. BBP - Dividend Comparison

PENG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, while BBP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BBP Virtus LifeSci Biotech Products ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.18%	0.00%	1.29%
PENG Penguin Solutions, Inc	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PENG and BBP in my portfolio?

PENG and BBP have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PENG or BBP?

PENG has higher volatility (39.67%) compared to BBP (7.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PENG dropped -68.72% vs BBP's -44.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.