PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PENG vs. AEHR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PENG vs. AEHR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) and Aehr Test Systems (AEHR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PENG achieves a 169.19% return, which is significantly lower than AEHR's 296.14% return.


PENG

1D
2.33%
1M
-14.34%
6M
174.09%
YTD
169.19%
1Y
130.84%
3Y*
25.09%
5Y*
17.59%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
26.68%

AEHR

1D
4.05%
1M
14.32%
6M
211.93%
YTD
296.14%
1Y
374.94%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
70.08%
10Y*
45.82%
ALL TIME*
6.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$231.69M$269.50M$230.50M
$177.31M$330.68M$244.03M

PENG vs. AEHR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PENG
Penguin Solutions, Inc
169.19%1.93%1.37%27.22%-58.08%88.65%-0.82%27.74%-11.87%180.83%
AEHR
Aehr Test Systems
296.14%21.41%-37.32%31.99%-16.87%855.73%26.50%41.84%-47.97%-40.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PENG and AEHR is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017

0.38

The correlation between PENG and AEHR shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.56 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PENG:

$2.70B

AEHR:

$2.61B

EPS

PENG:

$0.24

AEHR:

-$0.23

PS Ratio

PENG:

1.42

AEHR:

49.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

PENG:

$1.50B

AEHR:

$50.00M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PENG:

$419.76M

AEHR:

$17.65M

EBITDA (TTM)

PENG:

$125.18M

AEHR:

-$10.85M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PENG vs. AEHR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PENG
PENG Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
PENG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PENG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PENG Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
PENG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PENG Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

AEHR
AEHR Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AEHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEHR Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
AEHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEHR Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PENG vs. AEHR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) and Aehr Test Systems (AEHR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PENGAEHRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.68

8.57

-5.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.08

17.93

-12.84

PENG vs. AEHR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PENG Sharpe Ratio is 1.56, which is lower than the AEHR Sharpe Ratio of 2.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PENG and AEHR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PENG vs. AEHR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PENG drawdown since its inception was -68.72%, smaller than the maximum AEHR drawdown of -97.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PENG and AEHR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PENGAEHRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.72%

-97.98%

+29.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-46.28%

-43.90%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.21%

-87.16%

+35.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-65.40%

-87.37%

+21.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.31%

-31.39%

-3.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.06%

-79.35%

+42.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.36%

20.94%

+3.42%

Volatility

PENG vs. AEHR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Penguin Solutions, Inc (PENG) is 42.87%, while Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) has a volatility of 50.37%. This indicates that PENG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AEHR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PENGAEHRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

42.87%

50.37%

-7.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

68.58%

99.99%

-31.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

79.59%

125.91%

-46.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.70%

102.69%

-39.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

64.39%

95.34%

-30.95%

Dividends

PENG vs. AEHR - Dividend Comparison

PENG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while AEHR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM
AEHR
Aehr Test Systems
0.00%
PENG
Penguin Solutions, Inc
0.06%

Financials

PENG vs. AEHR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Penguin Solutions, Inc and Aehr Test Systems. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

PENG vs. AEHR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Penguin Solutions, Inc and Aehr Test Systems over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

PENG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Penguin Solutions, Inc reported a gross profit of 133.70M and revenue of 478.71M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.9%.

AEHR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported a gross profit of 8.02M and revenue of 18.84M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.6%.

PENG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Penguin Solutions, Inc reported an operating income of 50.86M and revenue of 478.71M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.6%.

AEHR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported an operating income of -987.00K and revenue of 18.84M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.2%.

PENG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Penguin Solutions, Inc reported a net income of -42.17M and revenue of 478.71M, resulting in a net margin of -8.8%.

AEHR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported a net income of 1.39M and revenue of 18.84M, resulting in a net margin of 7.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PENG and AEHR have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEHR has higher volatility (50.37%) compared to PENG (42.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PENG dropped -68.72% vs AEHR's -97.98%.

AEHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PENG and AEHR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer