PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AEHR vs. AVGO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AEHR vs. AVGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AEHR achieves a 407.13% return, which is significantly higher than AVGO's 10.24% return. Over the past 10 years, AEHR has outperformed AVGO with an annualized return of 50.48%, while AVGO has yielded a comparatively lower 41.81% annualized return.


AEHR

1D
-9.65%
1M
7.76%
YTD
407.13%
6M
349.67%
1Y
810.13%
3Y*
36.85%
5Y*
107.37%
10Y*
50.48%

AVGO

1D
-3.06%
1M
-8.06%
YTD
10.24%
6M
9.23%
1Y
50.90%
3Y*
68.61%
5Y*
54.78%
10Y*
41.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AEHR vs. AVGO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AEHR
Aehr Test Systems
407.13%21.41%-37.32%31.99%-16.87%855.73%26.50%41.84%-47.97%12.45%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
10.24%50.63%110.49%104.18%-13.27%56.48%44.88%29.05%2.18%48.19%

Correlation

The correlation between AEHR and AVGO is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2009

0.24

The correlation between AEHR and AVGO shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AEHR:

$3.14B

AVGO:

$1.85T

EPS

AEHR:

-$0.38

AVGO:

$6.01

PS Ratio

AEHR:

68.38

AVGO:

24.57

PB Ratio

AEHR:

22.64

AVGO:

21.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

AEHR:

$45.26M

AVGO:

$75.47B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AEHR:

$13.90M

AVGO:

$50.53B

EBITDA (TTM)

AEHR:

-$13.56M

AVGO:

$42.03B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AEHR vs. AVGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AEHR
AEHR Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
AEHR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AEHR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
AEHR Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
AEHR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
AEHR Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

AVGO
AVGO Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
AVGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGO Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AEHR vs. AVGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) and Broadcom Inc. (AVGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AEHRAVGODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+5.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.22

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

19.34

1.78

+17.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

43.44

4.04

+39.40

AEHR vs. AVGO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AEHR Sharpe Ratio is 6.84, which is higher than the AVGO Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AEHR and AVGO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AEHR vs. AVGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AEHR drawdown since its inception was -97.98%, which is greater than AVGO's maximum drawdown of -48.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEHR and AVGO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AEHRAVGODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.98%

-48.30%

-49.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-42.31%

-28.67%

-13.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-87.37%

-41.15%

-46.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-87.37%

-41.15%

-46.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-87.37%

-48.30%

-39.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.17%

-20.94%

+8.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-79.53%

-8.00%

-71.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.80%

12.64%

+6.16%

Volatility

AEHR vs. AVGO - Volatility Comparison

Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) has a higher volatility of 38.64% compared to Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) at 21.76%. This indicates that AEHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AVGO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AEHRAVGODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

38.64%

21.76%

+16.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

88.90%

33.46%

+55.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

119.59%

46.50%

+73.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

110.16%

43.63%

+66.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

94.02%

39.60%

+54.42%

Dividends

AEHR vs. AVGO - Dividend Comparison

AEHR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AEHR
Aehr Test Systems
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AVGO
Broadcom Inc.
0.67%0.70%0.94%1.71%3.02%2.24%3.05%3.54%3.11%1.87%1.43%1.13%

Financials

AEHR vs. AVGO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aehr Test Systems and Broadcom Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
10.31M
22.19B
(AEHR) Total Revenue
(AVGO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AEHR vs. AVGO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Aehr Test Systems and Broadcom Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026April
32.7%
67.2%
Portfolio components
AEHR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported a gross profit of 3.37M and revenue of 10.31M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.

AVGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.

AEHR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported an operating income of -4.23M and revenue of 10.31M, resulting in an operating margin of -41.0%.

AVGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.

AEHR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aehr Test Systems reported a net income of -3.20M and revenue of 10.31M, resulting in a net margin of -31.1%.

AVGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AEHR and AVGO have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AEHR has higher volatility (38.64%) compared to AVGO (21.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AEHR dropped -97.98% vs AVGO's -48.30%.

AEHR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.84 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AEHR and AVGO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer