AEHR vs. SPY
Compare and contrast key facts about Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY).
SPY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 1993.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AEHR or SPY.
Correlation
The correlation between AEHR and SPY is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Maximize Your Portfolio’s Potential
Does your portfolio have the optimal asset allocation aligned with your goals? Find it out with our portfolio optimizer
Try portfolio optimization nowPerformance
AEHR vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AEHR:
-0.24
SPY:
2.17
AEHR:
0.25
SPY:
2.88
AEHR:
1.03
SPY:
1.40
AEHR:
-0.26
SPY:
3.26
AEHR:
-0.53
SPY:
14.09
AEHR:
39.31%
SPY:
1.95%
AEHR:
87.24%
SPY:
12.64%
AEHR:
-97.98%
SPY:
-55.19%
AEHR:
-66.88%
SPY:
-2.83%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AEHR achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 0.44% return. Over the past 10 years, AEHR has outperformed SPY with an annualized return of 21.21%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively lower 13.15% annualized return.
AEHR
6.92%
51.97%
43.27%
-19.22%
52.93%
21.21%
SPY
0.44%
-2.83%
6.59%
25.62%
14.26%
13.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AEHR vs. SPY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AEHR
SPY
AEHR vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AEHR vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
AEHR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%.
TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aehr Test Systems | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.20% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% | 1.87% |
Drawdowns
AEHR vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AEHR drawdown since its inception was -97.98%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AEHR and SPY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AEHR vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Aehr Test Systems (AEHR) has a higher volatility of 28.11% compared to SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.49%. This indicates that AEHR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
User Portfolios with AEHR or SPY
Recent discussions
Discrepancy between SPY and ^GSPC?
Hello, from the charts, SPY seems to be outperforming its benchmark ^GSPC. That looks strange. From my understanding, SPY is designed to closely track the S&P 500.
Could there be an error in the charts?
Hedge Cat
Basis of calculations: historical or modelled?
Hi,
I am new to Portfolioslab. I cannot find any statement describing whether returns and heat maps of users' and lazy's portfolios are based on actual historical data, or are simply modelled on the basis of current portfolio composition.
I would greatly appreciate a clarification.
Thanks
Luca
Filtering portfolio screening columns
Bee Zee