PEMX vs. FLKR

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

PEMX (Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF) and FLKR (Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEMX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Putnam, while FLKR is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE South Korea RIC Capped Index. PEMX is actively managed, while FLKR is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PEMX returned 33.94%/yr vs 49.62%/yr for FLKR. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEMX charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLKR.

Performance

PEMX vs. FLKR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEMX achieves a 42.45% return, which is significantly lower than FLKR's 112.26% return.

PEMX

• 1D: 3.95%
• 1M: 12.26%
• YTD: 42.45%
• 6M: 47.78%
• 1Y: 74.75%
• 3Y*: 33.94%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FLKR

• 1D: 7.15%
• 1M: 17.17%
• YTD: 112.26%
• 6M: 128.12%
• 1Y: 212.42%
• 3Y*: 49.62%
• 5Y*: 19.64%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEMX vs. FLKR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	42.45%	34.01%	17.21%	15.13%
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	112.26%	91.91%	-18.84%	10.53%

Correlation

The correlation between PEMX and FLKR is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2023	0.78

The correlation between PEMX and FLKR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PEMX vs. FLKR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEMX

PEMX Risk / Return Rank: 91
PEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
PEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

FLKR

FLKR Risk / Return Rank: 96
FLKR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FLKR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FLKR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLKR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEMX vs. FLKR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) and Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PEMX	FLKR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.15	4.63	-1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.77	4.26	-0.49
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.63	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.20	9.29	-4.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	19.79	32.27	-12.48

PEMX vs. FLKR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is lower than the FLKR Sharpe Ratio of 4.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEMX and FLKR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PEMX vs. FLKR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEMX drawdown since its inception was -14.91%, smaller than the maximum FLKR drawdown of -50.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEMX and FLKR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEMX	FLKR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.91%	-50.06%	+35.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.45%	-23.03%	+8.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.91%	-26.39%	+11.48%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-49.51%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.76%	+2.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.86%	-22.02%	+19.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.79%	6.61%	-2.82%

Volatility

PEMX vs. FLKR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF (PEMX) is 13.14%, while Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF (FLKR) has a volatility of 26.71%. This indicates that PEMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLKR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PEMX	FLKR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.14%	26.71%	-13.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.52%	42.52%	-21.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.92%	46.33%	-22.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.05%	29.77%	-10.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.05%	28.47%	-9.42%

PEMX vs. FLKR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEMX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FLKR's 0.09% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEMX vs. FLKR - Dividend Comparison

PEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.92%, more than FLKR's 1.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FLKR Franklin FTSE South Korea ETF	1.82%	3.87%	7.08%	2.28%	3.13%	2.12%	0.99%	2.09%	1.86%	1.02%
PEMX Putnam Emerging Markets Ex-China ETF	4.92%	7.00%	5.00%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEMX and FLKR in my portfolio?

PEMX and FLKR have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PEMX or FLKR?

FLKR has higher volatility (26.71%) compared to PEMX (13.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEMX dropped -14.91% vs FLKR's -50.06%.

Which ETF is better, PEMX or FLKR?

On 3-year performance, FLKR leads with 49.62% vs 33.94% for PEMX. On fees, FLKR is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, PEMX has been the lower-risk option at 13.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PEMX or FLKR?

Over the 3-year period, FLKR has performed better with a 49.62% return vs 33.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PEMX or FLKR?

FLKR is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PEMX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PEMX or FLKR?

PEMX has the higher dividend yield at 4.92%, compared with 1.82% for FLKR.

What is the main difference between PEMX and FLKR?

PEMX is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while FLKR is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PEMX and 0.09% for FLKR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLKR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.63 vs 3.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.