PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PELBX vs. EEIAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PELBX vs. EEIAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PELBX achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly lower than EEIAX's 4.98% return. Over the past 10 years, PELBX has underperformed EEIAX with an annualized return of 4.15%, while EEIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.69% annualized return.


PELBX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.48%
6M
-0.68%
YTD
1.68%
1Y
10.29%
3Y*
8.68%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
4.15%
ALL TIME*
3.72%

EEIAX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.37%
6M
1.69%
YTD
4.98%
1Y
15.41%
3Y*
9.27%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
4.69%
ALL TIME*
4.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PELBX vs. EEIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PELBX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund
1.68%22.96%-0.75%15.11%-7.36%-8.13%2.16%17.23%-7.49%15.44%
EEIAX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
4.98%23.43%-1.23%13.63%-11.99%-7.64%4.68%22.66%-8.38%16.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PELBX and EEIAX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2007

0.91

The correlation between PELBX and EEIAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PELBX vs. EEIAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PELBX
PELBX Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
PELBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PELBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
PELBX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PELBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PELBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

EEIAX
EEIAX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
EEIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EEIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PELBX vs. EEIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PELBXEEIAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.99

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

2.23

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.73

7.93

-3.19

PELBX vs. EEIAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PELBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the EEIAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PELBX and EEIAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PELBX vs. EEIAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PELBX drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, which is greater than EEIAX's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PELBX and EEIAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PELBXEEIAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-31.70%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-7.40%

+0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.33%

-8.40%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.73%

-25.94%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.89%

-28.43%

+3.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-0.94%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.16%

-8.85%

-2.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

2.08%

+0.22%

Volatility

PELBX vs. EEIAX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) have volatilities of 1.95% and 2.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PELBXEEIAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

2.03%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.57%

6.56%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.41%

7.46%

-0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.09%

8.23%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.79%

8.36%

+0.43%

PELBX vs. EEIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PELBX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than EEIAX's 1.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

PELBX vs. EEIAX - Dividend Comparison

PELBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, less than EEIAX's 10.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EEIAX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
10.02%8.48%11.19%11.34%13.39%11.14%9.77%13.03%10.48%8.74%10.80%11.65%
PELBX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund
6.56%6.71%7.08%4.81%3.24%4.87%4.87%6.14%6.88%5.84%5.69%5.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


PELBX and EEIAX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEIAX has higher volatility (2.03%) compared to PELBX (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PELBX dropped -36.17% vs EEIAX's -31.70%.

EEIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PELBX and EEIAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer