PELBX vs. EEIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX).
PELBX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006. EEIAX is managed by Eaton Vance. It was launched on Jun 26, 2007.
Performance
PELBX vs. EEIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PELBX vs. EEIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PELBX PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund | -3.25% | 22.96% | -0.75% | 15.11% | -7.36% | -8.13% | 2.16% | 17.23% | -7.49% | 15.44% |
EEIAX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund | -0.99% | 23.43% | -1.23% | 13.63% | -11.99% | -7.64% | 4.68% | 22.66% | -8.38% | 16.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PELBX achieves a -3.25% return, which is significantly lower than EEIAX's -0.99% return. Over the past 10 years, PELBX has underperformed EEIAX with an annualized return of 4.03%, while EEIAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.56% annualized return.
PELBX
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -5.56%
- YTD
- -3.25%
- 6M
- 0.83%
- 1Y
- 13.36%
- 3Y*
- 8.77%
- 5Y*
- 4.46%
- 10Y*
- 4.03%
EEIAX
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -5.04%
- YTD
- -0.99%
- 6M
- 4.40%
- 1Y
- 18.10%
- 3Y*
- 8.97%
- 5Y*
- 3.83%
- 10Y*
- 4.56%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PELBX vs. EEIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PELBX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than EEIAX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PELBX vs. EEIAX — Risk / Return Rank
PELBX
EEIAX
PELBX vs. EEIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PELBX | EEIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.05 | 2.66 | -0.61 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.81 | 3.68 | -0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.53 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.92 | 2.45 | -0.53 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.62 | 11.20 | -2.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PELBX | EEIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.05 | 2.66 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.48 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.54 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.41 | -0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between PELBX and EEIAX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PELBX vs. EEIAX - Dividend Comparison
PELBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, less than EEIAX's 10.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PELBX PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund | 6.57% | 6.71% | 7.08% | 4.81% | 3.24% | 4.87% | 4.87% | 6.14% | 6.88% | 5.84% | 5.69% | 5.51% |
EEIAX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund | 10.48% | 8.48% | 11.19% | 11.34% | 13.39% | 11.14% | 9.77% | 13.03% | 10.48% | 8.74% | 10.80% | 11.65% |
Drawdowns
PELBX vs. EEIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PELBX drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, which is greater than EEIAX's maximum drawdown of -31.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PELBX and EEIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PELBX | EEIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.17% | -31.70% | -4.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.33% | -7.40% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.01% | -26.72% | +3.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.89% | -28.43% | +3.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.72% | -6.58% | -0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.30% | -8.97% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 1.62% | +0.01% |
Volatility
PELBX vs. EEIAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) is 3.46%, while Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) has a volatility of 3.71%. This indicates that PELBX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PELBX | EEIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.46% | 3.71% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.89% | 5.17% | -0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.62% | 6.83% | -0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.91% | 8.06% | -0.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.94% | 8.43% | +0.51% |