EEIAX vs. EGFIX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

EEIAX (Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund) and EGFIX (Edgewood Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - EEIAX is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by Eaton Vance, while EGFIX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Edgewood. Over the past 10 years, EEIAX returned 4.69%/yr vs 12.37%/yr for EGFIX. Their 0.38 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. EEIAX charges 1.19%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for EGFIX.

Performance

EEIAX vs. EGFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) and Edgewood Growth Fund (EGFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEIAX achieves a 4.98% return, which is significantly higher than EGFIX's -6.49% return. Over the past 10 years, EEIAX has underperformed EGFIX with an annualized return of 4.69%, while EGFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.37% annualized return.

EEIAX

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -0.37%
• 6M: 1.69%
• YTD: 4.98%
• 1Y: 15.41%
• 3Y*: 8.97%
• 5Y*: 4.35%
• 10Y*: 4.69%
• ALL TIME*: 4.22%

EGFIX

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: -4.81%
• 6M: -3.08%
• YTD: -6.49%
• 1Y: -4.35%
• 3Y*: 8.14%
• 5Y*: -0.45%
• 10Y*: 12.37%
• ALL TIME*: 10.82%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EEIAX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
EGFIX Edgewood Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

EEIAX vs. EGFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EEIAX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund	4.98%	23.43%	-1.23%	13.63%	-11.99%	-7.64%	4.68%	22.66%	-8.38%	16.10%
EGFIX Edgewood Growth Fund	-6.49%	7.44%	18.38%	39.74%	-40.51%	23.71%	42.24%	34.18%	2.22%	34.81%

Correlation

The correlation between EEIAX and EGFIX is 0.39, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.27
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.34
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2007	0.38

The correlation between EEIAX and EGFIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

EEIAX vs. EGFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

EEIAX

EEIAX Risk / Return Rank: 78
EEIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
EEIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
EEIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
EEIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
EEIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

EGFIX

EGFIX Risk / Return Rank: 2
EGFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
EGFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EGFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EGFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EGFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

EEIAX vs. EGFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) and Edgewood Growth Fund (EGFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EEIAX	EGFIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	-0.39	+2.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	-0.42	+3.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	0.95	+0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.19	-0.39	+2.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.76	-0.97	+8.73

EEIAX vs. EGFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is higher than the EGFIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEIAX and EGFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EEIAX vs. EGFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEIAX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, smaller than the maximum EGFIX drawdown of -52.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEIAX and EGFIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EEIAX	EGFIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.70%	-52.01%	+20.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.40%	-18.32%	+10.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.40%	-30.15%	+21.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.94%	-49.42%	+23.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.43%	-49.42%	+20.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.94%	-15.42%	+14.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.85%	-11.00%	+2.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.08%	7.53%	-5.45%

Volatility

EEIAX vs. EGFIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) is 2.05%, while Edgewood Growth Fund (EGFIX) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that EEIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EGFIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EEIAX	EGFIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.05%	4.36%	-2.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.57%	15.12%	-8.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.49%	18.42%	-10.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.23%	25.34%	-17.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.36%	23.58%	-15.22%

EEIAX vs. EGFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEIAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than EGFIX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

EEIAX vs. EGFIX - Dividend Comparison

EEIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.02%, less than EGFIX's 920.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEIAX Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund	10.02%	8.48%	11.19%	11.34%	13.39%	11.14%	9.77%	13.03%	10.48%	8.74%	10.80%	11.65%
EGFIX Edgewood Growth Fund	920.20%	49.54%	17.57%	0.00%	15.16%	5.77%	5.79%	0.28%	4.96%	1.30%	2.15%	3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EEIAX and EGFIX in my portfolio?

EEIAX and EGFIX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EEIAX or EGFIX?

EGFIX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to EEIAX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEIAX dropped -31.70% vs EGFIX's -52.01%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEIAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.