PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEIAX vs. EADOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEIAX vs. EADOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEIAX achieves a 4.01% return, which is significantly lower than EADOX's 6.50% return. Over the past 10 years, EEIAX has underperformed EADOX with an annualized return of 4.96%, while EADOX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.79% annualized return.


EEIAX

1D
0.28%
1M
1.03%
YTD
4.01%
6M
5.89%
1Y
17.18%
3Y*
10.36%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*
4.96%

EADOX

1D
0.23%
1M
0.87%
YTD
6.50%
6M
8.08%
1Y
18.74%
3Y*
15.27%
5Y*
8.06%
10Y*
7.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEIAX vs. EADOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EEIAX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
4.01%23.43%-1.23%13.63%-11.99%-7.64%4.68%22.66%-8.38%16.10%
EADOX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A
6.50%16.93%14.52%11.13%-6.42%1.24%7.12%17.85%-4.44%12.58%

Correlation

The correlation between EEIAX and EADOX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.63

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.62

The correlation between EEIAX and EADOX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (3 years) to 0.63 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEIAX vs. EADOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEIAX
EEIAX Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
EEIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
EEIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

EADOX
EADOX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
EADOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EADOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
EADOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
EADOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
EADOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEIAX vs. EADOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) and Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EEIAXEADOXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.42

5.54

-3.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.47

8.79

-5.32

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

2.61

-1.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

5.10

-2.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.60

20.78

-12.18

EEIAX vs. EADOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is lower than the EADOX Sharpe Ratio of 5.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEIAX and EADOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EEIAXEADOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

5.54

-3.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

1.77

-1.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

1.66

-1.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

1.71

-1.27

Drawdowns

EEIAX vs. EADOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEIAX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, which is greater than EADOX's maximum drawdown of -19.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEIAX and EADOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEIAXEADOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.70%

-19.15%

-12.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

-3.61%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.34%

-3.61%

-5.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.72%

-17.56%

-9.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.43%

-19.15%

-9.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.86%

0.00%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.92%

-2.53%

-6.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.00%

0.89%

+1.11%

Volatility

EEIAX vs. EADOX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) has a higher volatility of 2.43% compared to Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A (EADOX) at 0.64%. This indicates that EEIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EADOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEIAXEADOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.43%

0.64%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.23%

2.99%

+3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.30%

3.38%

+3.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.19%

4.57%

+3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.44%

4.71%

+3.73%

EEIAX vs. EADOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEIAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is higher than EADOX's 1.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEIAX vs. EADOX - Dividend Comparison

EEIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.97%, less than EADOX's 10.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EADOX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund Class A
10.46%10.51%8.27%8.73%8.87%7.56%7.42%7.57%7.83%7.61%4.04%0.00%
EEIAX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
9.97%8.48%11.19%11.34%13.39%11.14%9.77%13.03%10.48%8.74%10.80%11.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEIAX and EADOX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEIAX has higher volatility (2.43%) compared to EADOX (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEIAX dropped -31.70% vs EADOX's -19.15%.

EADOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.54 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEIAX and EADOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer