PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EEIAX vs. APFOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EEIAX vs. APFOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) and Artisan Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (APFOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EEIAX achieves a 4.30% return, which is significantly lower than APFOX's 5.74% return.


EEIAX

1D
-0.56%
1M
1.61%
YTD
4.30%
6M
5.30%
1Y
16.81%
3Y*
9.55%
5Y*
4.22%
10Y*
4.86%

APFOX

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.60%
YTD
5.74%
6M
6.49%
1Y
15.59%
3Y*
11.52%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EEIAX vs. APFOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
EEIAX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
4.30%23.43%-1.23%13.63%0.42%
APFOX
Artisan Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund
5.74%13.45%10.61%11.44%7.85%

Correlation

The correlation between EEIAX and APFOX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2022

0.56

The correlation between EEIAX and APFOX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EEIAX vs. APFOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EEIAX
EEIAX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
EEIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EEIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
EEIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EEIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
EEIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

APFOX
APFOX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
APFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
APFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
APFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
APFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
APFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EEIAX vs. APFOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) and Artisan Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (APFOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EEIAXAPFOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

2.39

-0.96

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.24

4.87

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.02

20.40

-12.38

EEIAX vs. APFOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EEIAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is lower than the APFOX Sharpe Ratio of 5.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EEIAX and APFOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EEIAX vs. APFOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EEIAX drawdown since its inception was -31.70%, which is greater than APFOX's maximum drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EEIAX and APFOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EEIAXAPFOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.70%

-5.69%

-26.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

-3.21%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.34%

-5.69%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-0.18%

-1.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-0.70%

-8.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

0.76%

+1.30%

Volatility

EEIAX vs. APFOX - Volatility Comparison

Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund (EEIAX) has a higher volatility of 2.18% compared to Artisan Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund (APFOX) at 0.74%. This indicates that EEIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APFOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EEIAXAPFOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.18%

0.74%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.45%

2.51%

+3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.46%

2.87%

+4.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.21%

3.73%

+4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.42%

3.73%

+4.69%

EEIAX vs. APFOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EEIAX has a 1.19% expense ratio, which is lower than APFOX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EEIAX vs. APFOX - Dividend Comparison

EEIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.94%, more than APFOX's 7.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
APFOX
Artisan Emerging Markets Debt Opportunities Fund
7.12%5.71%9.39%9.03%7.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
EEIAX
Eaton Vance Emerging Markets Local Income Fund
9.94%8.48%11.19%11.34%13.39%11.14%9.77%13.03%10.48%8.74%10.80%11.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


EEIAX and APFOX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EEIAX has higher volatility (2.18%) compared to APFOX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EEIAX dropped -31.70% vs APFOX's -5.69%.

APFOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.43 vs 2.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EEIAX and APFOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer