PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PELBX vs. DBLEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PELBX vs. DBLEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PELBX achieves a 1.68% return, which is significantly higher than DBLEX's 1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, PELBX has outperformed DBLEX with an annualized return of 4.15%, while DBLEX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.42% annualized return.


PELBX

1D
0.80%
1M
-0.48%
6M
-0.53%
YTD
1.68%
1Y
10.29%
3Y*
8.31%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*
4.15%
ALL TIME*
3.72%

DBLEX

1D
-0.11%
1M
-0.56%
6M
0.28%
YTD
1.00%
1Y
3.76%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
1.82%
10Y*
3.42%
ALL TIME*
4.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PELBX vs. DBLEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PELBX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund
1.68%22.96%-0.75%15.11%-7.36%-8.13%2.16%17.23%-7.49%15.44%
DBLEX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund
1.00%8.39%8.20%9.64%-15.30%1.97%4.85%11.80%-3.20%8.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PELBX and DBLEX is 0.48, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2010

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PELBX vs. DBLEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PELBX
PELBX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PELBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PELBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PELBX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
PELBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
PELBX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

DBLEX
DBLEX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
DBLEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DBLEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
DBLEX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
DBLEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
DBLEX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PELBX vs. DBLEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) and DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PELBXDBLEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.38

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

2.15

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.87

8.34

-3.47

PELBX vs. DBLEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PELBX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the DBLEX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PELBX and DBLEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PELBX vs. DBLEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PELBX drawdown since its inception was -36.17%, which is greater than DBLEX's maximum drawdown of -25.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PELBX and DBLEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PELBXDBLEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.17%

-25.43%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-1.81%

-5.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.33%

-4.43%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.73%

-25.43%

+3.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.89%

-25.43%

+0.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.97%

-0.82%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.16%

-3.45%

-7.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

0.47%

+1.83%

Volatility

PELBX vs. DBLEX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund (PELBX) has a higher volatility of 1.98% compared to DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund (DBLEX) at 0.54%. This indicates that PELBX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBLEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PELBXDBLEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.98%

0.54%

+1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.57%

1.63%

+4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.43%

2.12%

+5.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.10%

4.51%

+3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.79%

4.64%

+4.15%

PELBX vs. DBLEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PELBX has a 1.22% expense ratio, which is higher than DBLEX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

PELBX vs. DBLEX - Dividend Comparison

PELBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.56%, more than DBLEX's 5.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DBLEX
DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income Fund
5.11%5.59%5.97%5.54%4.77%4.00%4.37%4.57%3.83%4.33%4.54%5.21%
PELBX
PIMCO Emerging Markets Local Currency and Bond Fund
6.56%6.71%7.08%4.81%3.24%4.87%4.87%6.14%6.88%5.84%5.69%5.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


PELBX and DBLEX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PELBX has higher volatility (1.98%) compared to DBLEX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PELBX dropped -36.17% vs DBLEX's -25.43%.

DBLEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PELBX and DBLEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer