PEJ vs. VCAR

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF) and VCAR (Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. PEJ is passively managed, while VCAR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PEJ returned 6.79%/yr vs 9.95%/yr for VCAR. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PEJ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for VCAR.

Performance

PEJ vs. VCAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEJ achieves a 8.38% return, which is significantly higher than VCAR's -12.21% return.

PEJ

• 1D: 0.71%
• 1M: 1.01%
• 6M: 7.06%
• YTD: 8.38%
• 1Y: 15.29%
• 3Y*: 16.24%
• 5Y*: 6.79%
• 10Y*: 7.02%

VCAR

• 1D: -2.76%
• 1M: -7.29%
• 6M: -9.18%
• YTD: -12.21%
• 1Y: -25.27%
• 3Y*: 22.90%
• 5Y*: 9.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEJ vs. VCAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF	8.38%	17.78%	25.08%	15.73%	-25.37%	22.78%	0.83%
VCAR Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF	-12.21%	-14.73%	152.27%	58.33%	-61.11%	18.52%	2.57%

Correlation

The correlation between PEJ and VCAR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.40
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 29, 2020	0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between PEJ and VCAR has dropped to 0.23 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PEJ vs. VCAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PEJ	VCAR
Consumer Cyclical	48.6%	100.0%
Communication Services	22.1%	-
Consumer Defensive	7.8%	-
Technology	2.8%	-
Industrials	2.6%	-
Financial Services	0.1%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PEJ vs. VCAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEJ

PEJ Risk / Return Rank: 30
PEJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
PEJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
PEJ Omega Ratio Rank: 26
PEJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
PEJ Martin Ratio Rank: 32

VCAR

VCAR Risk / Return Rank: 6
VCAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
VCAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
VCAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6
VCAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
VCAR Martin Ratio Rank: 6

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEJ vs. VCAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PEJ	VCAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.83	-0.45	+1.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.34	-0.32	+1.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.96	+0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	-0.45	+1.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.84	-0.74	+4.58

PEJ vs. VCAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is higher than the VCAR Sharpe Ratio of -0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEJ and VCAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PEJ vs. VCAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEJ drawdown since its inception was -66.03%, roughly equal to the maximum VCAR drawdown of -69.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEJ and VCAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEJ	VCAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.03%	-69.11%	+3.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.29%	-56.12%	+45.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.75%	-56.12%	+30.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.74%	-69.11%	+34.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.04%	-45.53%	+43.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.26%	-37.78%	+25.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.99%	34.27%	-30.28%

Volatility

PEJ vs. VCAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) is 4.77%, while Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR) has a volatility of 18.06%. This indicates that PEJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PEJ	VCAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	18.06%	-13.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.61%	38.86%	-24.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.54%	57.05%	-38.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.74%	51.48%	-28.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.70%	50.31%	-25.61%

PEJ vs. VCAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEJ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than VCAR's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEJ vs. VCAR - Dividend Comparison

PEJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than VCAR's 25.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF	0.50%	0.24%	0.40%	0.46%	0.43%	0.34%	0.92%	0.39%	0.78%	0.68%	0.68%	0.52%
VCAR Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF	25.21%	23.87%	0.62%	0.00%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEJ and VCAR in my portfolio?

PEJ and VCAR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PEJ or VCAR?

VCAR has higher volatility (18.06%) compared to PEJ (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEJ dropped -66.03% vs VCAR's -69.11%.

Which ETF is better, PEJ or VCAR?

On 5-year performance, VCAR leads with 9.95% vs 6.79% for PEJ. On fees, PEJ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PEJ has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PEJ or VCAR?

Over the 5-year period, VCAR has performed better with a 9.95% return vs 6.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PEJ or VCAR?

PEJ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for VCAR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PEJ or VCAR?

VCAR has the higher dividend yield at 25.21%, compared with 0.50% for PEJ.

What is the main difference between PEJ and VCAR?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PEJ and 0.95% for VCAR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PEJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs -0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.