PEJ vs. VCAR
PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF) and VCAR (Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds. PEJ is passively managed, while VCAR is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PEJ returned 3.81%/yr vs 14.14%/yr for VCAR. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PEJ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for VCAR.
Performance
PEJ vs. VCAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEJ achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly higher than VCAR's 0.60% return.
PEJ
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 4.67%
- 1Y
- 15.85%
- 3Y*
- 15.88%
- 5Y*
- 3.81%
- 10Y*
- 6.54%
VCAR
- 1D
- -2.63%
- 1M
- 23.98%
- YTD
- 0.60%
- 6M
- -18.80%
- 1Y
- -14.28%
- 3Y*
- 33.50%
- 5Y*
- 14.14%
- 10Y*
- —
PEJ vs. VCAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 1.65% | 17.78% | 25.08% | 15.73% | -25.37% | 22.78% | 1.60% |
VCAR Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF | 0.60% | -14.73% | 152.27% | 58.33% | -61.11% | 18.52% | 4.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEJ and VCAR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2020 | 0.48 |
The correlation between PEJ and VCAR shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PEJ vs. VCAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEJ
VCAR
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
PEJ
VCAR
Communication Services
PEJ
VCAR
-
Industrials
PEJ
VCAR
-
Consumer Defensive
PEJ
VCAR
-
Technology
PEJ
VCAR
-
Basic Materials
PEJ
-
VCAR
-
Energy
PEJ
-
VCAR
-
Financial Services
PEJ
-
VCAR
-
Healthcare
PEJ
-
VCAR
-
Real Estate
PEJ
-
VCAR
-
Utilities
PEJ
-
VCAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEJ vs. VCAR — Risk / Return Rank
PEJ
VCAR
PEJ vs. VCAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEJ | VCAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.00 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | -0.26 | +1.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.00 | -0.46 | +4.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEJ | VCAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | -0.25 | +1.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.28 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.20 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
PEJ vs. VCAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEJ drawdown since its inception was -66.03%, roughly equal to the maximum VCAR drawdown of -69.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEJ and VCAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEJ | VCAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.03% | -69.11% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -56.12% | +45.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.75% | -56.12% | +30.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.44% | -69.11% | +33.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.58% | -37.58% | +35.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -37.70% | +25.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 31.22% | -27.25% |
Volatility
PEJ vs. VCAR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) is 5.92%, while Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF (VCAR) has a volatility of 24.38%. This indicates that PEJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VCAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEJ | VCAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.92% | 24.38% | -18.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.90% | 41.08% | -27.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 56.90% | -38.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 50.69% | -27.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.75% | 50.02% | -25.27% |
PEJ vs. VCAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEJ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than VCAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEJ vs. VCAR - Dividend Comparison
PEJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than VCAR's 22.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 0.39% | 0.24% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.92% | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.52% |
VCAR Simplify Volt RoboCar Disruption and Tech ETF | 22.86% | 23.87% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.83% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEJ and VCAR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VCAR has higher volatility (24.38%) compared to PEJ (5.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEJ dropped -66.03% vs VCAR's -69.11%.
On 5-year performance, VCAR leads with 14.14% vs 3.81% for PEJ. On fees, PEJ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PEJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VCAR has performed better with a 14.14% return vs 3.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PEJ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for VCAR.
VCAR has the higher dividend yield at 22.86%, compared with 0.39% for PEJ.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PEJ and 0.95% for VCAR.
PEJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEJ and VCAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer