PEJ vs. USCF
PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF) and USCF (Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEJ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index, while USCF is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Solactive US Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PEJ returned 16.68% vs 18.96% for USCF. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEJ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for USCF.
Performance
PEJ vs. USCF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEJ achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly lower than USCF's 5.32% return.
PEJ
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 3.84%
- YTD
- 2.55%
- 6M
- 5.77%
- 1Y
- 16.68%
- 3Y*
- 16.28%
- 5Y*
- 3.99%
- 10Y*
- 6.63%
USCF
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- 1.88%
- YTD
- 5.32%
- 6M
- 5.78%
- 1Y
- 18.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PEJ vs. USCF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 2.55% | 17.78% | 25.08% | 1.60% |
USCF Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF | 5.32% | 15.71% | 17.65% | 2.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between PEJ and USCF is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023 | 0.57 |
The correlation between PEJ and USCF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.
PEJ vs. USCF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PEJ
USCF
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
PEJ
USCF
Communication Services
PEJ
USCF
Industrials
PEJ
USCF
Consumer Defensive
PEJ
USCF
Technology
PEJ
USCF
Basic Materials
PEJ
-
USCF
Energy
PEJ
-
USCF
Financial Services
PEJ
-
USCF
Healthcare
PEJ
-
USCF
Real Estate
PEJ
-
USCF
Utilities
PEJ
-
USCF
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PEJ vs. USCF — Risk / Return Rank
PEJ
USCF
PEJ vs. USCF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (USCF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEJ | USCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.28 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 3.31 | -1.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.21 | 9.99 | -5.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEJ | USCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 1.48 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 1.11 | -0.78 |
Drawdowns
PEJ vs. USCF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEJ drawdown since its inception was -66.03%, which is greater than USCF's maximum drawdown of -16.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEJ and USCF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEJ | USCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.03% | -16.67% | -49.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.29% | -5.75% | -4.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.75% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.96% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.72% | 0.00% | -1.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.32% | -2.22% | -10.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 1.90% | +2.07% |
Volatility
PEJ vs. USCF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (USCF) at 2.78%. This indicates that PEJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USCF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PEJ | USCF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.87% | 2.78% | +3.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.92% | 10.14% | +3.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.49% | 12.86% | +5.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.79% | 15.16% | +7.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.74% | 15.16% | +9.58% |
PEJ vs. USCF - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEJ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than USCF's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
PEJ vs. USCF - Dividend Comparison
PEJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than USCF's 1.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF | 0.39% | 0.24% | 0.40% | 0.46% | 0.43% | 0.34% | 0.92% | 0.39% | 0.78% | 0.68% | 0.68% | 0.52% |
USCF Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF | 1.74% | 1.84% | 1.19% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PEJ and USCF have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PEJ has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to USCF (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEJ dropped -66.03% vs USCF's -16.67%.
On 1-year performance, USCF leads with 18.96% vs 16.68% for PEJ. On fees, USCF is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, USCF has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, USCF has performed better with a 18.96% return vs 16.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USCF is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PEJ.
USCF has the higher dividend yield at 1.74%, compared with 0.39% for PEJ.
PEJ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while USCF is Large Cap Value Equities. PEJ tracks Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index, while USCF tracks Solactive US Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Themes. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PEJ and 0.29% for USCF.
USCF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PEJ and USCF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer