PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
USCF vs. SCHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

USCF vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (USCF) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, USCF achieves a 4.16% return, which is significantly lower than SCHM's 19.05% return.


USCF

1D
0.61%
1M
0.73%
YTD
4.16%
6M
6.20%
1Y
17.35%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SCHM

1D
-0.03%
1M
5.28%
YTD
19.05%
6M
19.54%
1Y
32.45%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

USCF vs. SCHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
USCF
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF
4.16%15.71%17.65%2.14%
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
19.05%10.17%11.98%2.85%

Correlation

The correlation between USCF and SCHM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2023

0.72

The correlation between USCF and SCHM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

USCF vs. SCHM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
USCF
SCHM

Financial Services

43.1%
11.3%

Energy

21.1%
3.6%

Healthcare

16.6%
10.8%

Technology

9.7%
22.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.4%
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

2.7%
10.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
4.7%

Communication Services

0.6%
2.6%

Industrials

0.4%
21.4%

Real Estate

0.1%
6.5%

Utilities

-

3.0%

Financial Services

USCF
43.1%
SCHM
11.3%

Energy

USCF
21.1%
SCHM
3.6%

Healthcare

USCF
16.6%
SCHM
10.8%

Technology

USCF
9.7%
SCHM
22.0%

Consumer Defensive

USCF
3.4%
SCHM
3.8%

Consumer Cyclical

USCF
2.7%
SCHM
10.3%

Basic Materials

USCF
1.7%
SCHM
4.7%

Communication Services

USCF
0.6%
SCHM
2.6%

Industrials

USCF
0.4%
SCHM
21.4%

Real Estate

USCF
0.1%
SCHM
6.5%

Utilities

USCF

-

SCHM
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

USCF vs. SCHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

USCF
USCF Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
USCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
USCF Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
USCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
USCF Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHM
SCHM Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SCHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHM Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHM Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

USCF vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (USCF) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


USCFSCHMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.36

2.09

-0.73

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.91

2.94

-1.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.36

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.12

3.50

-0.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.43

14.11

-4.68

USCF vs. SCHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current USCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the SCHM Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of USCF and SCHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


USCFSCHMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.36

2.09

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.59

+0.49

Drawdowns

USCF vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum USCF drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, smaller than the maximum SCHM drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for USCF and SCHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


USCFSCHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-42.43%

+25.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.75%

-9.32%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.59%

-0.03%

-0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-5.66%

+3.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.31%

-0.41%

Volatility

USCF vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF (USCF) is 2.58%, while Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) has a volatility of 4.72%. This indicates that USCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


USCFSCHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.58%

4.72%

-2.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.07%

11.74%

-1.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.82%

15.62%

-2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.17%

19.56%

-4.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.17%

20.46%

-5.29%

USCF vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison

USCF has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHM's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

USCF vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison

USCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, more than SCHM's 1.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHM
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF
1.22%1.46%1.43%1.50%1.67%1.13%1.31%1.48%1.56%1.27%1.51%1.54%
USCF
Themes US Cash Flow Champions ETF
1.76%1.84%1.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


USCF and SCHM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHM has higher volatility (4.72%) compared to USCF (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, USCF dropped -16.67% vs SCHM's -42.43%.

On 1-year performance, SCHM leads with 32.45% vs 17.35% for USCF. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, USCF has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SCHM has performed better with a 32.45% return vs 17.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for USCF.

USCF has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 1.22% for SCHM.

USCF is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SCHM is Mid Cap Growth Equities. USCF tracks Solactive US Cash Flow Champions Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. They also come from different issuers: Themes and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for USCF and 0.04% for SCHM.

SCHM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for USCF and SCHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer