PEJ vs. RSPD

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF) and RSPD (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both Consumer Discretionary Equities funds from Invesco - PEJ tracks the Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index while RSPD tracks the S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEJ returned 6.63%/yr vs 7.99%/yr for RSPD. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PEJ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for RSPD.

Performance

PEJ vs. RSPD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEJ achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly higher than RSPD's -3.79% return. Over the past 10 years, PEJ has underperformed RSPD with an annualized return of 6.63%, while RSPD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.99% annualized return.

PEJ

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 3.84%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 6M: 5.77%
• 1Y: 16.68%
• 3Y*: 16.28%
• 5Y*: 3.99%
• 10Y*: 6.63%

RSPD

• 1D: 0.53%
• 1M: 1.69%
• YTD: -3.79%
• 6M: -2.61%
• 1Y: 5.83%
• 3Y*: 9.97%
• 5Y*: 3.24%
• 10Y*: 7.99%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEJ vs. RSPD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF	2.55%	17.78%	25.08%	15.73%	-25.37%	22.78%	-10.29%	13.82%	-9.31%	11.22%
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	-3.79%	7.98%	13.37%	22.55%	-24.03%	28.75%	11.43%	25.88%	-8.79%	15.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PEJ and RSPD is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2006	0.80

The correlation between PEJ and RSPD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

PEJ vs. RSPD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PEJ	RSPD
Consumer Cyclical	59.7%	93.8%
Communication Services	23.3%	2.0%
Industrials	10.2%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	-
Technology	4.2%	2.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.1%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PEJ vs. RSPD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEJ

PEJ Risk / Return Rank: 28
PEJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
PEJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
PEJ Omega Ratio Rank: 25
PEJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
PEJ Martin Ratio Rank: 30

RSPD

RSPD Risk / Return Rank: 14
RSPD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
RSPD Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
RSPD Omega Ratio Rank: 14
RSPD Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
RSPD Martin Ratio Rank: 14

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEJ vs. RSPD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PEJ	RSPD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	0.32	+0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	0.62	+0.82
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.07	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	0.42	+1.20
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.21	1.05	+3.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PEJ vs. RSPD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is higher than the RSPD Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEJ and RSPD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PEJ	RSPD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	0.32	+0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18	0.15	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	0.35	-0.08
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.33	0.00

Drawdowns

PEJ vs. RSPD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEJ drawdown since its inception was -66.03%, roughly equal to the maximum RSPD drawdown of -68.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEJ and RSPD.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEJ	RSPD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.03%	-68.00%	+1.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.29%	-13.80%	+3.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.75%	-21.01%	-4.74%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.44%	-34.41%	-1.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.96%	-48.00%	-10.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.72%	-8.59%	+6.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.32%	-10.70%	-1.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.97%	5.54%	-1.57%

Volatility

PEJ vs. RSPD - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) has a higher volatility of 5.87% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF (RSPD) at 5.35%. This indicates that PEJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RSPD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PEJ	RSPD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.87%	5.35%	+0.52%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.92%	13.46%	+0.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.49%	18.24%	+0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.79%	22.10%	+0.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.74%	23.10%	+1.64%

PEJ vs. RSPD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEJ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than RSPD's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEJ vs. RSPD - Dividend Comparison

PEJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than RSPD's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF	0.39%	0.24%	0.40%	0.46%	0.43%	0.34%	0.92%	0.39%	0.78%	0.68%	0.68%	0.52%
RSPD Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Consumer Discretionary ETF	1.02%	1.08%	0.84%	1.09%	0.99%	0.53%	0.81%	1.59%	1.67%	1.45%	1.27%	1.37%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEJ and RSPD in my portfolio?

PEJ and RSPD have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PEJ or RSPD?

PEJ has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to RSPD (5.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEJ dropped -66.03% vs RSPD's -68.00%.

Which ETF is better, PEJ or RSPD?

On 10-year performance, RSPD leads with 7.99% vs 6.63% for PEJ. On fees, RSPD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, RSPD has been the lower-risk option at 5.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PEJ or RSPD?

Over the 10-year period, RSPD has performed better with a 7.99% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PEJ or RSPD?

RSPD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for PEJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PEJ or RSPD?

RSPD has the higher dividend yield at 1.02%, compared with 0.39% for PEJ.

What is the main difference between PEJ and RSPD?

PEJ tracks Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index, while RSPD tracks S&P 500 Equal Weighted / Consumer Discretionary -SEC. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PEJ and 0.40% for RSPD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PEJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.