PEJ vs. PPA

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

PEJ (Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF) and PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PEJ is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index, while PPA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PEJ returned 6.63%/yr vs 17.53%/yr for PPA. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PEJ charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PPA.

Performance

PEJ vs. PPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PEJ achieves a 2.55% return, which is significantly lower than PPA's 10.82% return. Over the past 10 years, PEJ has underperformed PPA with an annualized return of 6.63%, while PPA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.53% annualized return.

PEJ

• 1D: 0.88%
• 1M: 3.84%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 6M: 5.77%
• 1Y: 16.68%
• 3Y*: 16.28%
• 5Y*: 3.99%
• 10Y*: 6.63%

PPA

• 1D: 2.10%
• 1M: 5.79%
• YTD: 10.82%
• 6M: 14.31%
• 1Y: 28.82%
• 3Y*: 30.12%
• 5Y*: 18.31%
• 10Y*: 17.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PEJ vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF	2.55%	17.78%	25.08%	15.73%	-25.37%	22.78%	-10.29%	13.82%	-9.31%	11.22%
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF	10.82%	37.15%	25.28%	18.41%	9.52%	7.09%	0.45%	39.63%	-7.51%	30.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PEJ and PPA is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.58
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2005	0.69

The correlation between PEJ and PPA shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PEJ vs. PPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PEJ	PPA
Consumer Cyclical	59.7%	-
Communication Services	23.3%	0.1%
Industrials	10.2%	90.1%
Consumer Defensive	6.8%	-
Technology	4.2%	9.8%
Basic Materials	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

PEJ vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PEJ

PEJ Risk / Return Rank: 28
PEJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
PEJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
PEJ Omega Ratio Rank: 25
PEJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
PEJ Martin Ratio Rank: 30

PPA

PPA Risk / Return Rank: 43
PPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
PPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
PPA Omega Ratio Rank: 41
PPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
PPA Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PEJ vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PEJ	PPA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.91	1.51	-0.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	2.20	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.26	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	2.11	-0.49
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.21	6.14	-1.93
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PEJ vs. PPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PEJ Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is lower than the PPA Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PEJ and PPA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PEJ	PPA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91	1.51	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18	0.99	-0.82
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27	0.85	-0.58
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.66	-0.34

Drawdowns

PEJ vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PEJ drawdown since its inception was -66.03%, which is greater than PPA's maximum drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEJ and PPA.

Drawdown Indicators

	PEJ	PPA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.03%	-57.37%	-8.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.29%	-13.71%	+3.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.75%	-15.24%	-10.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.44%	-18.37%	-17.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.96%	-43.92%	-15.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.72%	-6.47%	+4.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.32%	-9.18%	-3.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.97%	4.70%	-0.73%

Volatility

PEJ vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF (PEJ) is 5.87%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that PEJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PEJ	PPA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.87%	6.97%	-1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.92%	16.05%	-2.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.49%	19.12%	-0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.79%	18.51%	+4.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.74%	20.64%	+4.10%

PEJ vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

PEJ has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than PPA's 0.58% expense ratio.

Dividends

PEJ vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison

PEJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, more than PPA's 0.38% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PEJ Invesco Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment ETF	0.39%	0.24%	0.40%	0.46%	0.43%	0.34%	0.92%	0.39%	0.78%	0.68%	0.68%	0.52%
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF	0.38%	0.42%	0.61%	0.67%	0.83%	0.59%	0.88%	0.95%	0.90%	0.67%	1.70%	1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PEJ and PPA in my portfolio?

PEJ and PPA have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PEJ or PPA?

PPA has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to PEJ (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PEJ dropped -66.03% vs PPA's -57.37%.

Which ETF is better, PEJ or PPA?

On 10-year performance, PPA leads with 17.53% vs 6.63% for PEJ. On fees, PEJ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, PEJ has been the lower-risk option at 5.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PEJ or PPA?

Over the 10-year period, PPA has performed better with a 17.53% return vs 6.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PEJ or PPA?

PEJ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PPA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PEJ or PPA?

PEJ and PPA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.39%.

What is the main difference between PEJ and PPA?

PEJ is categorized as Consumer Discretionary Equities, while PPA is Aerospace & Defense. PEJ tracks Dynamic Leisure and Entertainment Intellidex Index, while PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for PEJ and 0.58% for PPA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.