PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDX vs. RLTY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDX vs. RLTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDX achieves a 16.96% return, which is significantly higher than RLTY's 10.21% return.


PDX

1D
0.05%
1M
1.25%
YTD
16.96%
6M
18.79%
1Y
10.21%
3Y*
25.37%
5Y*
21.65%
10Y*

RLTY

1D
-0.64%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
10.21%
6M
9.62%
1Y
12.63%
3Y*
14.75%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDX vs. RLTY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
PDX
PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund
16.96%-10.59%36.99%44.51%16.08%
RLTY
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund
10.21%8.56%15.40%14.05%-27.73%

Correlation

The correlation between PDX and RLTY is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2022

0.29

The correlation between PDX and RLTY shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.29 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDX vs. RLTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDX
PDX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
PDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

RLTY
RLTY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
RLTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RLTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
RLTY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
RLTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
RLTY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDX vs. RLTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) and Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDXRLTYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.17

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

1.11

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.50

3.69

-2.20

PDX vs. RLTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.71, which is comparable to the RLTY Sharpe Ratio of 0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDX and RLTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDXRLTYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

0.96

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.14

+0.16

Drawdowns

PDX vs. RLTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDX drawdown since its inception was -80.63%, which is greater than RLTY's maximum drawdown of -35.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDX and RLTY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDXRLTYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.63%

-35.44%

-45.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.65%

-11.40%

-4.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.24%

-20.81%

-16.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.04%

-1.39%

-13.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.84%

-13.73%

-5.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.84%

3.43%

+3.41%

Volatility

PDX vs. RLTY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund (PDX) is 2.71%, while Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund (RLTY) has a volatility of 3.95%. This indicates that PDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RLTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDXRLTYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

3.95%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.17%

10.15%

+0.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.40%

13.17%

+1.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.61%

22.73%

+2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.46%

22.73%

+13.73%

Dividends

PDX vs. RLTY - Dividend Comparison

PDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.50%, more than RLTY's 8.45% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PDX
PIMCO Dynamic Income Strategy Fund
21.50%24.34%6.31%4.30%5.89%5.28%14.11%9.58%
RLTY
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Opportunities & Income Fund
8.45%8.98%8.93%9.18%6.94%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDX and RLTY have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RLTY has higher volatility (3.95%) compared to PDX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDX dropped -80.63% vs RLTY's -35.44%.

RLTY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDX and RLTY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer