PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDP vs. ULVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDP vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDP achieves a 24.95% return, which is significantly higher than ULVM's 14.84% return.


PDP

1D
0.57%
1M
6.22%
YTD
24.95%
6M
24.18%
1Y
37.20%
3Y*
24.44%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
13.60%

ULVM

1D
-0.13%
1M
3.70%
YTD
14.84%
6M
14.92%
1Y
28.96%
3Y*
21.27%
5Y*
11.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDP vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDP
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
24.95%8.37%26.06%20.88%-24.49%7.72%36.59%33.13%-5.96%2.85%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
14.84%15.84%19.76%10.16%-9.04%31.06%3.51%22.08%-12.07%4.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PDP and ULVM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017

0.82

The correlation between PDP and ULVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PDP vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PDP
ULVM

Industrials

39.2%
12.2%

Technology

26.9%
13.1%

Healthcare

6.5%
10.1%

Energy

6.3%
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
5.3%

Financial Services

4.4%
22.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
4.7%

Basic Materials

2.3%
4.1%

Communication Services

2.2%
3.5%

Utilities

1.6%
12.6%

Real Estate

1.3%
8.7%

Industrials

PDP
39.2%
ULVM
12.2%

Technology

PDP
26.9%
ULVM
13.1%

Healthcare

PDP
6.5%
ULVM
10.1%

Energy

PDP
6.3%
ULVM
3.4%

Consumer Cyclical

PDP
5.5%
ULVM
5.3%

Financial Services

PDP
4.4%
ULVM
22.5%

Consumer Defensive

PDP
3.8%
ULVM
4.7%

Basic Materials

PDP
2.3%
ULVM
4.1%

Communication Services

PDP
2.2%
ULVM
3.5%

Utilities

PDP
1.6%
ULVM
12.6%

Real Estate

PDP
1.3%
ULVM
8.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDP vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDP
PDP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDP Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

ULVM
ULVM Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
ULVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ULVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
ULVM Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
ULVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
ULVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDP vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDPULVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.47

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

4.50

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

18.64

-7.48

PDP vs. ULVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDP Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is lower than the ULVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDP and ULVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDPULVMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

2.71

-1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.74

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.58

-0.12

Drawdowns

PDP vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDP drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, which is greater than ULVM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDP and ULVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDPULVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.34%

-40.71%

-18.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.87%

-6.47%

-5.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.79%

-18.14%

-5.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.91%

-19.77%

-14.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.13%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-5.75%

-4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

1.56%

+1.78%

Volatility

PDP vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 2.96%. This indicates that PDP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDPULVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

2.96%

+3.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.34%

7.97%

+9.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.94%

10.74%

+11.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.00%

15.48%

+6.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

18.86%

+2.73%

PDP vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDP has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDP vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison

PDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than ULVM's 1.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDP
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.11%0.17%0.15%0.42%0.45%0.00%0.11%0.25%0.18%0.28%0.81%0.39%
ULVM
VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF
1.58%1.81%1.57%1.94%1.91%1.36%1.51%1.88%1.67%0.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDP and ULVM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDP has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to ULVM (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDP dropped -59.34% vs ULVM's -40.71%.

On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.43% vs 11.32% for PDP. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 11.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PDP.

ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.11% for PDP.

PDP tracks Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PDP and 0.20% for ULVM.

ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDP and ULVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer