PDP vs. ULVM
PDP (Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) and ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds - PDP tracks the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index while ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PDP returned 11.32%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for ULVM. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PDP charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ULVM.
Performance
PDP vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDP achieves a 24.95% return, which is significantly higher than ULVM's 14.84% return.
PDP
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 6.22%
- YTD
- 24.95%
- 6M
- 24.18%
- 1Y
- 37.20%
- 3Y*
- 24.44%
- 5Y*
- 11.32%
- 10Y*
- 13.60%
ULVM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 14.84%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- —
PDP vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 24.95% | 8.37% | 26.06% | 20.88% | -24.49% | 7.72% | 36.59% | 33.13% | -5.96% | 2.85% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.84% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | -9.04% | 31.06% | 3.51% | 22.08% | -12.07% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDP and ULVM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.82 |
The correlation between PDP and ULVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.83 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PDP vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PDP
ULVM
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
PDP
ULVM
Technology
PDP
ULVM
Healthcare
PDP
ULVM
Energy
PDP
ULVM
Consumer Cyclical
PDP
ULVM
Financial Services
PDP
ULVM
Consumer Defensive
PDP
ULVM
Basic Materials
PDP
ULVM
Communication Services
PDP
ULVM
Utilities
PDP
ULVM
Real Estate
PDP
ULVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDP vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank
PDP
ULVM
PDP vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDP | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.47 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | 4.50 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.16 | 18.64 | -7.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDP | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 2.71 | -1.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | 0.74 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.58 | -0.12 |
Drawdowns
PDP vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDP drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, which is greater than ULVM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDP and ULVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDP | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.34% | -40.71% | -18.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -6.47% | -5.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.79% | -18.14% | -5.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.91% | -19.77% | -14.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.70% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.13% | +0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.61% | -5.75% | -4.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 1.56% | +1.78% |
Volatility
PDP vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 2.96%. This indicates that PDP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDP | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 2.96% | +3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.34% | 7.97% | +9.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.94% | 10.74% | +11.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.00% | 15.48% | +6.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.59% | 18.86% | +2.73% |
PDP vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDP has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDP vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison
PDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than ULVM's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.25% | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.81% | 0.39% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDP and ULVM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDP has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to ULVM (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDP dropped -59.34% vs ULVM's -40.71%.
On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.43% vs 11.32% for PDP. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 11.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PDP.
ULVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.58%, compared with 0.11% for PDP.
PDP tracks Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Victory Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PDP and 0.20% for ULVM.
ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDP and ULVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer