PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDP vs. IWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDP vs. IWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDP achieves a 24.95% return, which is significantly higher than IWR's 12.43% return. Over the past 10 years, PDP has outperformed IWR with an annualized return of 13.60%, while IWR has yielded a comparatively lower 11.55% annualized return.


PDP

1D
0.57%
1M
6.22%
YTD
24.95%
6M
24.18%
1Y
37.20%
3Y*
24.44%
5Y*
11.32%
10Y*
13.60%

IWR

1D
-0.26%
1M
3.79%
YTD
12.43%
6M
12.21%
1Y
21.66%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
8.00%
10Y*
11.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDP vs. IWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDP
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
24.95%8.37%26.06%20.88%-24.49%7.72%36.59%33.13%-5.96%23.30%
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
12.43%10.37%15.21%17.05%-17.48%22.44%16.93%30.23%-9.10%18.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PDP and IWR is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2007

0.90

The correlation between PDP and IWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.90 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PDP vs. IWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PDP
IWR

Industrials

39.2%
18.4%

Technology

26.9%
17.2%

Healthcare

6.5%
8.7%

Energy

6.3%
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

5.5%
11.2%

Financial Services

4.4%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
4.1%

Basic Materials

2.3%
4.3%

Communication Services

2.2%
3.4%

Utilities

1.6%
6.1%

Real Estate

1.3%
7.0%

Industrials

PDP
39.2%
IWR
18.4%

Technology

PDP
26.9%
IWR
17.2%

Healthcare

PDP
6.5%
IWR
8.7%

Energy

PDP
6.3%
IWR
7.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PDP
5.5%
IWR
11.2%

Financial Services

PDP
4.4%
IWR
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

PDP
3.8%
IWR
4.1%

Basic Materials

PDP
2.3%
IWR
4.3%

Communication Services

PDP
2.2%
IWR
3.4%

Utilities

PDP
1.6%
IWR
6.1%

Real Estate

PDP
1.3%
IWR
7.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDP vs. IWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDP
PDP Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDP Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDP Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

IWR
IWR Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
IWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWR Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDP vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDPIWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.28

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.15

2.66

+0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.16

10.28

+0.88

PDP vs. IWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDP Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the IWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDP and IWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDPIWRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

1.63

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.44

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.60

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.49

-0.04

Drawdowns

PDP vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDP drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, roughly equal to the maximum IWR drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDP and IWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDPIWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.34%

-58.78%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.87%

-8.17%

-3.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.79%

-21.09%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.91%

-26.18%

-7.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.70%

-40.59%

+5.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.26%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.61%

-7.80%

-2.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.34%

2.11%

+1.23%

Volatility

PDP vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) at 3.26%. This indicates that PDP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDPIWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.51%

3.26%

+3.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.34%

9.84%

+7.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.94%

13.39%

+8.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.00%

18.23%

+3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.59%

19.36%

+2.23%

PDP vs. IWR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDP has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than IWR's 0.19% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDP vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison

PDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than IWR's 1.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
1.15%1.29%1.27%1.43%1.59%1.04%1.28%1.43%1.98%1.52%1.72%1.59%
PDP
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.11%0.17%0.15%0.42%0.45%0.00%0.11%0.25%0.18%0.28%0.81%0.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDP and IWR have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDP has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to IWR (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDP dropped -59.34% vs IWR's -58.78%.

On 10-year performance, PDP leads with 13.60% vs 11.55% for IWR. On fees, IWR is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IWR has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PDP has performed better with a 13.60% return vs 11.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IWR is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PDP.

IWR has the higher dividend yield at 1.15%, compared with 0.11% for PDP.

PDP is categorized as Momentum, while IWR is Mid Cap Growth Equities. PDP tracks Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, while IWR tracks Russell Midcap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PDP and 0.19% for IWR.

PDP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDP and IWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer