PDP vs. IJS
PDP (Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) and IJS (iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PDP is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, while IJS is a Small Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PDP returned 13.08%/yr vs 9.96%/yr for IJS. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PDP charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IJS.
Performance
PDP vs. IJS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDP achieves a 22.46% return, which is significantly higher than IJS's 19.39% return. Over the past 10 years, PDP has outperformed IJS with an annualized return of 13.08%, while IJS has yielded a comparatively lower 9.96% annualized return.
PDP
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- 6M
- 17.20%
- YTD
- 22.46%
- 1Y
- 31.65%
- 3Y*
- 20.91%
- 5Y*
- 9.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
IJS
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 1.12%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- YTD
- 19.39%
- 1Y
- 32.14%
- 3Y*
- 13.76%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- 9.96%
PDP vs. IJS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 22.46% | 8.37% | 26.06% | 20.88% | -24.49% | 7.72% | 36.59% | 33.13% | -5.96% | 23.30% |
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 19.39% | 6.54% | 7.33% | 14.68% | -11.34% | 30.53% | 2.63% | 24.11% | -12.86% | 11.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDP and IJS is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007 | 0.76 |
The correlation between PDP and IJS shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PDP vs. IJS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PDP
IJS
Industrials
Technology
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
PDP
IJS
Technology
PDP
IJS
Energy
PDP
IJS
Healthcare
PDP
IJS
Consumer Cyclical
PDP
IJS
Financial Services
PDP
IJS
Consumer Defensive
PDP
IJS
Basic Materials
PDP
IJS
Communication Services
PDP
IJS
Utilities
PDP
IJS
Real Estate
PDP
IJS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDP vs. IJS — Risk / Return Rank
PDP
IJS
PDP vs. IJS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PDP | IJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.30 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.62 | 3.31 | -0.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.69 | 10.91 | -2.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PDP vs. IJS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDP drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, roughly equal to the maximum IJS drawdown of -60.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDP and IJS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDP | IJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.34% | -60.11% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -9.28% | -2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.79% | -28.65% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.91% | -28.65% | -5.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.70% | -47.68% | +12.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.94% | -1.42% | -5.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.56% | -9.86% | -0.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 2.83% | +0.75% |
Volatility
PDP vs. IJS - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) has a higher volatility of 10.27% compared to iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF (IJS) at 4.45%. This indicates that PDP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IJS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDP | IJS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.27% | 4.45% | +5.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.26% | 11.81% | +7.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.10% | 18.10% | +6.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.45% | 21.86% | +0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.79% | 23.53% | -1.74% |
PDP vs. IJS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDP has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than IJS's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDP vs. IJS - Dividend Comparison
PDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than IJS's 1.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IJS iShares S&P SmallCap 600 Value ETF | 1.33% | 1.62% | 1.78% | 1.42% | 1.46% | 1.52% | 1.00% | 1.66% | 1.75% | 1.41% | 1.22% | 1.59% |
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.08% | 0.17% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.25% | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.81% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDP and IJS have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDP has higher volatility (10.27%) compared to IJS (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDP dropped -59.34% vs IJS's -60.11%.
On 10-year performance, PDP leads with 13.08% vs 9.96% for IJS. On fees, IJS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IJS has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PDP has performed better with a 13.08% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IJS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PDP.
IJS has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 0.08% for PDP.
PDP is categorized as Momentum, while IJS is Small Cap Value Equities. PDP tracks Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, while IJS tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PDP and 0.25% for IJS.
IJS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDP and IJS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer