PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDO vs. LLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PDO vs. LLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDO achieves a -1.72% return, which is significantly lower than LLY's 5.78% return.


PDO

1D
0.78%
1M
1.23%
YTD
-1.72%
6M
-1.43%
1Y
7.30%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*

LLY

1D
-2.41%
1M
11.74%
YTD
5.78%
6M
10.64%
1Y
40.51%
3Y*
37.45%
5Y*
39.59%
10Y*
33.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDO vs. LLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PDO
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
-1.72%13.96%24.55%8.06%-23.40%5.98%
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
5.78%40.25%33.30%60.91%34.26%31.82%

Correlation

The correlation between PDO and LLY is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021

0.17

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDO vs. LLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDO
PDO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

LLY
LLY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
LLY Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
LLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
LLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDO vs. LLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) and Eli Lilly and Company (LLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDOLLYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.22

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.66

1.72

-1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.29

4.28

-2.00

PDO vs. LLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDO Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the LLY Sharpe Ratio of 1.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDO and LLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDO vs. LLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDO drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, smaller than the maximum LLY drawdown of -68.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDO and LLY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDOLLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.83%

-68.24%

+31.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.18%

-23.64%

+12.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.55%

-34.48%

+17.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.83%

-34.48%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.54%

-2.41%

-3.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.37%

-19.21%

+4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.20%

9.49%

-6.29%

Volatility

PDO vs. LLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) is 3.68%, while Eli Lilly and Company (LLY) has a volatility of 9.27%. This indicates that PDO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDOLLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.68%

9.27%

-5.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.06%

27.16%

-18.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.08%

38.01%

-27.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.80%

32.46%

-16.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.54%

30.19%

-14.65%

Dividends

PDO vs. LLY - Dividend Comparison

PDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.94%, more than LLY's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LLY
Eli Lilly and Company
0.57%0.56%0.67%0.78%1.07%1.23%1.75%1.96%1.94%2.46%2.77%2.37%
PDO
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
11.94%11.09%11.29%12.54%19.09%8.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

PDO vs. LLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund and Eli Lilly and Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B14.00B16.00B18.00B20.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
19.80B
(PDO) Total Revenue
(LLY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PDO and LLY have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LLY has higher volatility (9.27%) compared to PDO (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDO dropped -36.83% vs LLY's -68.24%.

LLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDO and LLY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer