PDO vs. AMLP
PDO (Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund) is a stock, while AMLP (Alerian MLP ETF) is MLPs fund tracking the Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Over the past 5 years, PDO returned 2.09%/yr vs 16.09%/yr for AMLP. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PDO vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDO achieves a -0.87% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 16.31% return.
PDO
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- YTD
- -0.87%
- 6M
- -0.96%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 12.41%
- 5Y*
- 2.09%
- 10Y*
- —
AMLP
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.85%
- YTD
- 16.31%
- 6M
- 14.77%
- 1Y
- 16.94%
- 3Y*
- 20.19%
- 5Y*
- 16.09%
- 10Y*
- 6.78%
PDO vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDO Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund | -0.87% | 13.96% | 24.55% | 8.06% | -23.40% | 5.93% |
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 16.31% | 5.78% | 22.76% | 21.40% | 25.47% | 33.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDO and AMLP is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2021 | 0.25 |
The correlation between PDO and AMLP shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDO vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank
PDO
AMLP
PDO vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDO | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.25 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 1.90 | -1.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.87 | 6.26 | -3.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDO | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.90 | 1.45 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 | 0.81 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.22 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
PDO vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDO drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDO and AMLP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDO | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.83% | -77.19% | +40.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.18% | -8.94% | -2.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.55% | -14.27% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.83% | -20.92% | -15.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -72.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.72% | -4.10% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.41% | -17.39% | +2.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 2.71% | +0.41% |
Volatility
PDO vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) is 3.87%, while Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a volatility of 4.58%. This indicates that PDO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDO | AMLP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.87% | 4.58% | -0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 8.64% | +0.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.01% | 11.78% | -1.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.80% | 19.97% | -4.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.55% | 27.68% | -12.13% |
Dividends
PDO vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison
PDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.72%, more than AMLP's 7.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AMLP Alerian MLP ETF | 7.64% | 8.36% | 7.70% | 7.86% | 7.70% | 8.55% | 12.31% | 9.12% | 9.29% | 7.97% | 8.09% | 9.84% |
PDO Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund | 11.72% | 11.09% | 11.29% | 12.54% | 19.09% | 8.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDO and AMLP have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AMLP has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to PDO (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDO dropped -36.83% vs AMLP's -77.19%.
AMLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDO and AMLP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer