PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDM vs. DHT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PDM vs. DHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) and DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDM achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly lower than DHT's 68.70% return. Over the past 10 years, PDM has underperformed DHT with an annualized return of -3.26%, while DHT has yielded a comparatively higher 23.05% annualized return.


PDM

1D
-1.99%
1M
8.05%
YTD
6.24%
6M
6.24%
1Y
20.71%
3Y*
14.56%
5Y*
-9.48%
10Y*
-3.26%

DHT

1D
-2.86%
1M
11.57%
YTD
68.70%
6M
70.09%
1Y
91.02%
3Y*
44.76%
5Y*
32.83%
10Y*
23.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDM vs. DHT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDM
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
6.24%-7.26%37.18%-14.77%-46.76%19.86%-23.46%35.96%-9.09%0.14%
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
68.70%40.04%3.58%24.07%73.87%1.41%-20.52%118.96%11.32%-9.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PDM and DHT is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2010

0.21

The correlation between PDM and DHT shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (3 years) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PDM:

$1.11B

DHT:

$3.13B

EPS

PDM:

-$0.69

DHT:

$2.06

PS Ratio

PDM:

2.61

DHT:

5.51

PB Ratio

PDM:

0.75

DHT:

2.54

Total Revenue (TTM)

PDM:

$422.31M

DHT:

$566.07M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PDM:

$80.86M

DHT:

$268.69M

EBITDA (TTM)

PDM:

$199.74M

DHT:

$450.13M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDM vs. DHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDM
PDM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PDM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDM Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
PDM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDM Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

DHT
DHT Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
DHT Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
DHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DHT Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDM vs. DHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) and DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDMDHTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.40

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.71

6.01

-5.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.89

13.73

-11.84

PDM vs. DHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDM Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the DHT Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDM and DHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDM vs. DHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDM drawdown since its inception was -73.72%, smaller than the maximum DHT drawdown of -97.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDM and DHT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDMDHTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.72%

-97.12%

+23.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.47%

-15.22%

-14.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.45%

-24.96%

-21.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-70.38%

-34.44%

-35.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.72%

-39.56%

-34.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.16%

-61.06%

+11.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.26%

-76.34%

+54.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.98%

6.65%

+4.33%

Volatility

PDM vs. DHT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (PDM) is 10.16%, while DHT Holdings, Inc. (DHT) has a volatility of 11.98%. This indicates that PDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDMDHTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.16%

11.98%

-1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.88%

28.42%

-3.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.46%

34.70%

-3.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.06%

38.50%

-2.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.39%

41.64%

-7.25%

Dividends

PDM vs. DHT - Dividend Comparison

PDM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DHT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DHT
DHT Holdings, Inc.
7.58%6.06%10.76%11.72%1.35%2.50%25.81%2.42%2.04%5.57%17.15%6.55%
PDM
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc.
0.00%1.50%5.46%9.42%9.16%5.71%5.18%3.78%4.93%6.83%4.02%4.45%

Financials

PDM vs. DHT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. and DHT Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M202220232024202520260
186.48M
(PDM) Total Revenue
(DHT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PDM and DHT have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DHT has higher volatility (11.98%) compared to PDM (10.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDM dropped -73.72% vs DHT's -97.12%.

DHT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDM and DHT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer