PDIV.TO vs. KILO.TO
PDIV.TO (Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF) and KILO.TO (Purpose Gold Bullion Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PDIV.TO is a Dividend fund actively managed by Purpose Investments, while KILO.TO is a Gold fund actively managed by Purpose Investments. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, PDIV.TO returned 7.86%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for KILO.TO. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PDIV.TO charges 0.77%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for KILO.TO.
Performance
PDIV.TO vs. KILO.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDIV.TO achieves a 8.23% return, which is significantly higher than KILO.TO's -5.68% return.
PDIV.TO
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 8.23%
- 6M
- 8.17%
- 1Y
- 19.90%
- 3Y*
- 12.22%
- 5Y*
- 7.86%
- 10Y*
- 9.44%
KILO.TO
- 1D
- -1.81%
- 1M
- -9.01%
- YTD
- -5.68%
- 6M
- -9.56%
- 1Y
- 18.91%
- 3Y*
- 26.73%
- 5Y*
- 16.78%
- 10Y*
- —
PDIV.TO vs. KILO.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDIV.TO Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF | 8.23% | 14.66% | 10.71% | 4.64% | -4.39% | 20.18% | 9.93% |
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | -5.68% | 60.17% | 25.97% | 12.15% | -0.90% | -4.72% | -2.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDIV.TO and KILO.TO is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2020 | 0.15 |
The correlation between PDIV.TO and KILO.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDIV.TO vs. KILO.TO — Risk / Return Rank
PDIV.TO
KILO.TO
PDIV.TO vs. KILO.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) and Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PDIV.TO | KILO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.15 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.79 | 0.76 | +3.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.54 | 2.01 | +14.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PDIV.TO vs. KILO.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDIV.TO drawdown since its inception was -30.64%, which is greater than KILO.TO's maximum drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDIV.TO and KILO.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDIV.TO | KILO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.64% | -24.90% | -5.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.27% | -24.90% | +19.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.82% | -24.90% | +16.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.93% | -24.90% | +8.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -24.51% | +24.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.35% | -6.79% | +2.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.21% | 9.44% | -8.23% |
Volatility
PDIV.TO vs. KILO.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF (PDIV.TO) is 2.24%, while Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) has a volatility of 7.88%. This indicates that PDIV.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KILO.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDIV.TO | KILO.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.24% | 7.88% | -5.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.46% | 23.72% | -18.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.91% | 27.23% | -20.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.05% | 18.13% | -8.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.94% | 17.86% | -3.92% |
PDIV.TO vs. KILO.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDIV.TO has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than KILO.TO's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDIV.TO vs. KILO.TO - Dividend Comparison
PDIV.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.73%, while KILO.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDIV.TO Purpose Enhanced Dividend Fund ETF | 11.73% | 11.23% | 12.35% | 11.84% | 6.38% | 5.59% | 6.33% | 5.85% | 6.80% | 25.71% | 5.38% | 8.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDIV.TO and KILO.TO have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KILO.TO is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KILO.TO is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for PDIV.TO.
PDIV.TO is categorized as Dividend, while KILO.TO is Gold. Their fees differ too: 0.77% for PDIV.TO and 0.28% for KILO.TO.
Find the right allocation for PDIV.TO and KILO.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer