KILO.TO vs. PHYS

In the year-to-date period, KILO.TO achieves a 25.41% return, which is significantly lower than PHYS's 27.12% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) and Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current KILO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the PHYS Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KILO.TO and PHYS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither KILO.TO nor PHYS has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum KILO.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.67%, smaller than the maximum PHYS drawdown of -48.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KILO.TO and PHYS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.09% compared to Sprott Physical Gold Trust (PHYS) at 4.17%. This indicates that KILO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHYS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.