KILO.TO vs. ZGLD.SW
Compare and contrast key facts about Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) and Swisscanto (CH) Gold ETF EA CHF (ZGLD.SW).
KILO.TO and ZGLD.SW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ZGLD.SW is a passively managed fund by Swisscanto that tracks the performance of the Gold Bullion. It was launched on Mar 14, 2006.
Performance
KILO.TO vs. ZGLD.SW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KILO.TO vs. ZGLD.SW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | 8.08% | 60.17% | 25.97% | 12.15% | -0.90% | -4.72% | 22.91% | 18.86% | 2.75% |
ZGLD.SW Swisscanto (CH) Gold ETF EA CHF | 8.29% | 58.60% | 36.26% | 10.70% | 6.00% | -4.60% | 21.23% | 13.39% | 8.50% |
Different Trading Currencies
KILO.TO is traded in CAD, while ZGLD.SW is traded in CHF. To make them comparable, the ZGLD.SW values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with KILO.TO having a 8.08% return and ZGLD.SW slightly higher at 8.29%.
KILO.TO
- 1D
- 3.92%
- 1M
- -11.13%
- YTD
- 8.08%
- 6M
- 19.90%
- 1Y
- 45.80%
- 3Y*
- 31.34%
- 5Y*
- 20.61%
- 10Y*
- —
ZGLD.SW
- 1D
- 2.30%
- 1M
- -9.52%
- YTD
- 8.29%
- 6M
- 20.35%
- 1Y
- 43.76%
- 3Y*
- 33.78%
- 5Y*
- 23.83%
- 10Y*
- 14.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KILO.TO vs. ZGLD.SW - Expense Ratio Comparison
Return for Risk
KILO.TO vs. ZGLD.SW — Risk / Return Rank
KILO.TO
ZGLD.SW
KILO.TO vs. ZGLD.SW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) and Swisscanto (CH) Gold ETF EA CHF (ZGLD.SW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KILO.TO | ZGLD.SW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 1.81 | -0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 2.31 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.33 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.45 | 2.88 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.04 | 11.38 | -2.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KILO.TO | ZGLD.SW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 1.81 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.17 | 1.49 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.65 | +0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between KILO.TO and ZGLD.SW is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
KILO.TO vs. ZGLD.SW - Dividend Comparison
Neither KILO.TO nor ZGLD.SW has paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KILO.TO Purpose Gold Bullion Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.41% |
ZGLD.SW Swisscanto (CH) Gold ETF EA CHF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
KILO.TO vs. ZGLD.SW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KILO.TO drawdown since its inception was -22.67%, smaller than the maximum ZGLD.SW drawdown of -32.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KILO.TO and ZGLD.SW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KILO.TO | ZGLD.SW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.67% | -38.49% | +15.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.62% | -16.91% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.31% | -16.94% | -4.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -16.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.50% | -10.76% | -2.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.02% | -14.24% | +7.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.31% | 4.39% | +0.92% |
Volatility
KILO.TO vs. ZGLD.SW - Volatility Comparison
Purpose Gold Bullion Fund (KILO.TO) and Swisscanto (CH) Gold ETF EA CHF (ZGLD.SW) have volatilities of 11.21% and 10.80%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KILO.TO | ZGLD.SW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.21% | 10.80% | +0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.93% | 20.83% | +3.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.59% | 24.56% | +3.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.66% | 16.05% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 15.21% | +2.83% |