PDI vs. UTF
PDI (PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund) and UTF (Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc) are both stocks. Both operate in the Asset Management industry within the Financial Services sector. Over the past 10 years, PDI returned 7.55%/yr vs 11.75%/yr for UTF. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PDI vs. UTF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDI achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than UTF's 17.84% return. Over the past 10 years, PDI has underperformed UTF with an annualized return of 7.55%, while UTF has yielded a comparatively higher 11.75% annualized return.
PDI
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -2.01%
- YTD
- -0.81%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- 1Y
- 0.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.87%
- 5Y*
- 2.19%
- 10Y*
- 7.55%
UTF
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 17.84%
- 6M
- 19.68%
- 1Y
- 14.41%
- 3Y*
- 16.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 11.75%
PDI vs. UTF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDI PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund | -0.81% | 11.03% | 17.18% | 11.99% | -16.99% | 7.81% | -9.96% | 22.23% | 7.35% | 18.59% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 17.84% | 9.93% | 22.37% | -3.83% | -9.60% | 17.91% | 6.93% | 42.74% | -9.87% | 34.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDI and UTF is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2012 | 0.31 |
Fundamentals
PDI:
$6.72B
UTF:
$2.65B
PDI:
$3.86
UTF:
$6.79
PDI:
4.23
UTF:
4.03
PDI:
0.06
UTF:
0.03
PDI:
3.13
UTF:
6.85
PDI:
0.91
UTF:
0.93
PDI:
$2.03B
UTF:
$387.16M
PDI:
$1.51B
UTF:
$388.42M
PDI:
$2.09B
UTF:
$765.72M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDI vs. UTF — Risk / Return Rank
PDI
UTF
PDI vs. UTF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PDI | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.01 | 1.20 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.01 | 1.37 | -1.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.03 | 2.79 | -2.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PDI vs. UTF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDI drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, smaller than the maximum UTF drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDI and UTF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDI | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.47% | -72.62% | +26.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -10.33% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.55% | -21.06% | +3.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.19% | -30.28% | +3.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.47% | -52.53% | +6.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.56% | 0.00% | -8.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.22% | -10.36% | +4.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.09% | 5.05% | +0.04% |
Volatility
PDI vs. UTF - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc (UTF) at 2.43%. This indicates that PDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UTF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDI | UTF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | 2.43% | +0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.27% | 8.40% | -0.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.31% | 12.40% | -1.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 18.33% | -2.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.04% | 23.34% | -4.30% |
Dividends
PDI vs. UTF - Dividend Comparison
PDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.24%, more than UTF's 6.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDI PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund | 16.24% | 14.94% | 14.43% | 14.74% | 17.84% | 10.21% | 10.01% | 9.45% | 10.78% | 8.81% | 14.79% | 18.70% |
UTF Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc | 6.87% | 7.62% | 7.74% | 8.76% | 7.75% | 6.53% | 7.20% | 7.10% | 10.12% | 7.37% | 10.51% | 8.39% |
Financials
PDI vs. UTF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund and Cohen & Steers Infrastructure Fund, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PDI and UTF have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDI has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to UTF (2.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDI dropped -46.47% vs UTF's -72.62%.
UTF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDI and UTF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer