PDI vs. CEFS
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS).
CEFS is an actively managed fund by Exchange Traded Concepts. It was launched on Mar 21, 2017.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: PDI or CEFS.
Performance
PDI vs. CEFS - Performance Comparison
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDI achieves a 20.22% return, which is significantly lower than CEFS's 24.27% return.
PDI
20.22%
-3.25%
6.00%
24.42%
1.83%
7.44%
CEFS
24.27%
-0.31%
8.51%
31.01%
12.26%
N/A
Key characteristics
| PDI | CEFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.42 | 2.99 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.84 | 4.00 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.55 | 1.52 |
| Calmar Ratio | 1.49 | 5.44 |
| Martin Ratio | 12.39 | 18.53 |
| Ulcer Index | 2.01% | 1.74% |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.30% | 10.80% |
| Max Drawdown | -46.47% | -38.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -6.71% | -1.56% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Correlation
The correlation between PDI and CEFS is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
PDI vs. CEFS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) and Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
PDI vs. CEFS - Dividend Comparison
PDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.93%, more than CEFS's 7.92% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDI PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund | 13.93% | 14.74% | 17.84% | 10.21% | 10.01% | 9.45% | 10.78% | 8.81% | 14.79% | 15.08% | 13.43% | 11.59% |
CEFS Saba Closed-End Funds ETF | 7.92% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 10.73% | 8.61% | 7.56% | 9.84% | 6.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PDI vs. CEFS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDI drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, which is greater than CEFS's maximum drawdown of -38.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDI and CEFS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
PDI vs. CEFS - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) has a higher volatility of 3.62% compared to Saba Closed-End Funds ETF (CEFS) at 3.39%. This indicates that PDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEFS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.