PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDI vs. IWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDI vs. IWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDI achieves a -0.81% return, which is significantly lower than IWR's 13.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PDI has underperformed IWR with an annualized return of 7.55%, while IWR has yielded a comparatively higher 11.79% annualized return.


PDI

1D
-0.79%
1M
-3.50%
YTD
-0.81%
6M
-0.75%
1Y
0.14%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
2.19%
10Y*
7.55%

IWR

1D
0.93%
1M
3.80%
YTD
13.23%
6M
11.96%
1Y
21.77%
3Y*
16.40%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
11.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDI vs. IWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
-0.81%11.03%17.18%11.99%-16.99%7.81%-9.96%22.23%7.35%18.59%
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
13.23%10.37%15.21%17.05%-17.48%22.44%16.93%30.23%-9.10%18.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PDI and IWR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2012

0.37

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDI vs. IWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDI
PDI Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDI Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDI Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

IWR
IWR Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
IWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWR Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
IWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDI vs. IWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) and iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDIIWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.28

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.01

2.68

-2.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.03

10.26

-10.23

PDI vs. IWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDI Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the IWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDI and IWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDI vs. IWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDI drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, smaller than the maximum IWR drawdown of -58.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDI and IWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDIIWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.47%

-58.78%

+12.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.95%

-8.17%

-2.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.55%

-21.09%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.19%

-26.18%

-1.01%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.47%

-40.59%

-5.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.56%

0.00%

-8.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-7.80%

+1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.09%

2.13%

+2.96%

Volatility

PDI vs. IWR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) is 3.31%, while iShares Russell Midcap ETF (IWR) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that PDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDIIWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

4.49%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.27%

10.34%

-2.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.31%

13.79%

-2.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.53%

18.28%

-2.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.04%

19.38%

-0.34%

Dividends

PDI vs. IWR - Dividend Comparison

PDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.24%, more than IWR's 1.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWR
iShares Russell Midcap ETF
1.14%1.29%1.27%1.43%1.59%1.04%1.28%1.43%1.98%1.52%1.72%1.59%
PDI
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund
16.24%14.94%14.43%14.74%17.84%10.21%10.01%9.45%10.78%8.81%14.79%18.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDI and IWR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWR has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to PDI (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDI dropped -46.47% vs IWR's -58.78%.

IWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDI and IWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer