PDI vs. EMB
PDI (PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund) is a stock, while EMB (iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the JPMorgan EMBI Global Core Index. Over the past 10 years, PDI returned 7.56%/yr vs 3.19%/yr for EMB. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PDI vs. EMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDI achieves a 0.27% return, which is significantly lower than EMB's 1.14% return. Over the past 10 years, PDI has outperformed EMB with an annualized return of 7.56%, while EMB has yielded a comparatively lower 3.19% annualized return.
PDI
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- -4.51%
- YTD
- 0.27%
- 6M
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 1.93%
- 3Y*
- 10.92%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- 7.56%
EMB
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- -0.48%
- YTD
- 1.14%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 10.87%
- 3Y*
- 9.37%
- 5Y*
- 1.62%
- 10Y*
- 3.19%
PDI vs. EMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDI PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund | 0.27% | 11.03% | 17.18% | 11.99% | -16.99% | 7.81% | -9.96% | 22.23% | 7.35% | 18.59% |
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 1.14% | 13.85% | 5.54% | 10.62% | -18.63% | -2.23% | 5.42% | 15.48% | -5.47% | 10.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDI and EMB is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2012 | 0.31 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDI vs. EMB — Risk / Return Rank
PDI
EMB
PDI vs. EMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) and iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDI | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.38 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.18 | 2.42 | -2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.39 | 10.32 | -9.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDI | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 | 1.95 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.17 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.32 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.43 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
PDI vs. EMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDI drawdown since its inception was -46.47%, which is greater than EMB's maximum drawdown of -34.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDI and EMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDI | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.47% | -34.70% | -11.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.95% | -4.51% | -6.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.55% | -7.95% | -9.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.23% | -28.74% | +1.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.47% | -28.74% | -17.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.57% | -1.02% | -6.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.22% | -5.06% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.98% | 1.06% | +3.92% |
Volatility
PDI vs. EMB - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund (PDI) has a higher volatility of 3.21% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (EMB) at 1.76%. This indicates that PDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDI | EMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.21% | 1.76% | +1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.14% | 4.57% | +3.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.24% | 5.60% | +5.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.53% | 9.75% | +5.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 9.96% | +9.09% |
Dividends
PDI vs. EMB - Dividend Comparison
PDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 15.84%, more than EMB's 5.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMB iShares J.P. Morgan USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 5.09% | 4.98% | 5.46% | 4.74% | 5.04% | 3.89% | 3.88% | 4.51% | 5.64% | 4.54% | 4.83% | 4.84% |
PDI PIMCO Dynamic Income Fund | 15.84% | 14.94% | 14.43% | 14.74% | 17.84% | 10.21% | 10.01% | 9.45% | 10.78% | 8.81% | 14.79% | 18.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDI and EMB have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDI has higher volatility (3.21%) compared to EMB (1.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDI dropped -46.47% vs EMB's -34.70%.
EMB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDI and EMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer