PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDFDX vs. JAGLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDFDX vs. JAGLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDFDX achieves a 1.98% return, which is significantly higher than JAGLX's -3.64% return. Over the past 10 years, PDFDX has underperformed JAGLX with an annualized return of 9.82%, while JAGLX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.81% annualized return.


PDFDX

1D
-0.19%
1M
5.46%
YTD
1.98%
6M
2.97%
1Y
31.05%
3Y*
8.77%
5Y*
-4.76%
10Y*
9.82%

JAGLX

1D
-2.63%
1M
-1.54%
YTD
-3.64%
6M
-2.05%
1Y
24.95%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
7.94%
10Y*
10.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDFDX vs. JAGLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDFDX
Perkins Discovery Fund
1.98%9.94%19.19%10.77%-39.93%2.11%62.16%15.01%22.19%11.58%
JAGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T
-3.64%24.72%8.50%7.41%-2.79%6.66%25.52%29.12%4.05%22.13%

Correlation

The correlation between PDFDX and JAGLX is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.45

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999

0.60

The correlation between PDFDX and JAGLX shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.67 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDFDX vs. JAGLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDFDX
PDFDX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
PDFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
PDFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

JAGLX
JAGLX Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JAGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JAGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JAGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JAGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JAGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDFDX vs. JAGLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX) and Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDFDXJAGLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.30

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

2.63

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.28

8.39

-4.10

PDFDX vs. JAGLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is comparable to the JAGLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDFDX and JAGLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDFDXJAGLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.29

1.72

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.16

0.50

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.62

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

0.58

-0.20

Drawdowns

PDFDX vs. JAGLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDFDX drawdown since its inception was -67.44%, which is greater than JAGLX's maximum drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDFDX and JAGLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDFDXJAGLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.44%

-58.96%

-8.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.11%

-9.71%

-12.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.75%

-17.41%

-14.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.95%

-22.25%

-37.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.70%

-27.38%

-35.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.65%

-6.54%

-28.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.72%

-17.43%

-8.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.80%

3.03%

+4.77%

Volatility

PDFDX vs. JAGLX - Volatility Comparison

Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX) has a higher volatility of 6.50% compared to Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T (JAGLX) at 4.69%. This indicates that PDFDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JAGLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDFDXJAGLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.50%

4.69%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.09%

10.95%

+7.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.02%

14.85%

+11.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.80%

15.92%

+13.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.96%

17.41%

+11.55%

PDFDX vs. JAGLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDFDX has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than JAGLX's 0.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDFDX vs. JAGLX - Dividend Comparison

PDFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.60%, more than JAGLX's 4.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JAGLX
Janus Henderson Global Life Sciences Fund Class T
4.70%4.53%10.98%4.22%0.14%9.78%7.75%6.17%13.38%0.89%1.13%9.09%
PDFDX
Perkins Discovery Fund
9.60%4.25%0.00%0.00%1.78%31.11%1.71%0.00%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDFDX and JAGLX have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDFDX has higher volatility (6.50%) compared to JAGLX (4.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDFDX dropped -67.44% vs JAGLX's -58.96%.

JAGLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDFDX and JAGLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer