PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDFDX vs. GGHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDFDX vs. GGHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX) and Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PDFDX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

GGHCX

1D
-0.64%
1M
-2.65%
6M
4.48%
YTD
3.51%
1Y
18.53%
3Y*
8.09%
5Y*
2.71%
10Y*
7.06%
ALL TIME*
9.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PDFDX vs. GGHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDFDX
Perkins Discovery Fund
4.76%9.94%19.19%10.77%-39.93%2.11%62.16%15.01%22.19%11.58%
GGHCX
Invesco Health Care Fund
3.51%15.48%3.96%3.05%-13.53%12.05%14.52%32.01%0.27%15.51%

Correlation

The correlation between PDFDX and GGHCX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 1998

0.56

The correlation between PDFDX and GGHCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.65 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDFDX vs. GGHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PDFDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GGHCX
GGHCX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
GGHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
GGHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PDFDX vs. GGHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX) and Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDFDXGGHCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.86

PDFDX vs. GGHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDFDX vs. GGHCX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDFDXGGHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.15%

Volatility

PDFDX vs. GGHCX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDFDXGGHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.44%

PDFDX vs. GGHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDFDX has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GGHCX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDFDX vs. GGHCX - Dividend Comparison

PDFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.34%, more than GGHCX's 5.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GGHCX
Invesco Health Care Fund
5.49%5.69%5.17%0.00%0.00%24.69%6.44%3.51%8.81%6.88%2.24%15.07%
PDFDX
Perkins Discovery Fund
9.34%4.25%0.00%0.00%1.78%31.11%1.71%0.00%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDFDX and GGHCX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDFDX and GGHCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer