PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDFDX vs. FIKCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDFDX vs. FIKCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z (FIKCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDFDX achieves a 4.69% return, which is significantly higher than FIKCX's 1.22% return.


PDFDX

1D
-1.14%
1M
3.89%
YTD
4.69%
6M
3.16%
1Y
33.98%
3Y*
9.14%
5Y*
-5.62%
10Y*
10.62%

FIKCX

1D
1.14%
1M
4.48%
YTD
1.22%
6M
-0.13%
1Y
22.67%
3Y*
3.56%
5Y*
0.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDFDX vs. FIKCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PDFDX
Perkins Discovery Fund
4.69%9.94%19.19%10.77%-39.93%2.11%62.16%15.01%-13.84%
FIKCX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z
1.22%14.61%-5.73%4.20%-12.74%11.66%21.55%28.39%-11.04%

Correlation

The correlation between PDFDX and FIKCX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2018

0.73

The correlation between PDFDX and FIKCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDFDX vs. FIKCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDFDX
PDFDX Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PDFDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDFDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDFDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PDFDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDFDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

FIKCX
FIKCX Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
FIKCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIKCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIKCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
FIKCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIKCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDFDX vs. FIKCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z (FIKCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDFDXFIKCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.24

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.60

1.72

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.51

4.55

-0.04

PDFDX vs. FIKCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDFDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the FIKCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDFDX and FIKCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDFDX vs. FIKCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDFDX drawdown since its inception was -67.44%, which is greater than FIKCX's maximum drawdown of -29.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDFDX and FIKCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDFDXFIKCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.44%

-29.19%

-38.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.11%

-13.35%

-8.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.75%

-25.31%

-6.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.95%

-29.19%

-30.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.92%

-4.99%

-27.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.73%

-9.26%

-16.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.81%

5.05%

+2.76%

Volatility

PDFDX vs. FIKCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX) is 4.49%, while Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z (FIKCX) has a volatility of 5.87%. This indicates that PDFDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIKCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDFDXFIKCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

5.87%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.89%

12.67%

+5.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.94%

16.45%

+9.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.78%

18.47%

+11.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.96%

20.29%

+8.67%

PDFDX vs. FIKCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDFDX has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKCX's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDFDX vs. FIKCX - Dividend Comparison

PDFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.35%, less than FIKCX's 11.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FIKCX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class Z
11.34%11.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%5.71%5.86%0.61%4.65%
PDFDX
Perkins Discovery Fund
9.35%4.25%0.00%0.00%1.78%31.11%1.71%0.00%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDFDX and FIKCX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIKCX has higher volatility (5.87%) compared to PDFDX (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDFDX dropped -67.44% vs FIKCX's -29.19%.

FIKCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDFDX and FIKCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer