PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDFDX vs. FHCCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDFDX vs. FHCCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PDFDX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

FHCCX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.31%
6M
9.98%
YTD
10.04%
1Y
9.60%
3Y*
2.43%
5Y*
-0.65%
10Y*
6.51%
ALL TIME*
9.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PDFDX vs. FHCCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDFDX
Perkins Discovery Fund
4.76%9.94%19.19%10.77%-39.93%2.11%62.16%15.01%22.19%11.58%
FHCCX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C
10.04%-5.49%3.20%3.02%-13.72%10.43%20.15%26.96%6.37%23.12%

Correlation

The correlation between PDFDX and FHCCX is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 8, 1998

0.58

The correlation between PDFDX and FHCCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDFDX vs. FHCCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PDFDX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FHCCX
FHCCX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FHCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FHCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PDFDX vs. FHCCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perkins Discovery Fund (PDFDX) and Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDFDXFHCCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.54

PDFDX vs. FHCCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDFDX vs. FHCCX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDFDXFHCCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.50%

Volatility

PDFDX vs. FHCCX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDFDXFHCCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.61%

PDFDX vs. FHCCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDFDX has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FHCCX's 1.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDFDX vs. FHCCX - Dividend Comparison

PDFDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.34%, while FHCCX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHCCX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C
0.00%0.00%17.59%0.00%0.00%8.32%6.85%0.41%6.43%0.00%0.00%7.84%
PDFDX
Perkins Discovery Fund
9.34%4.25%0.00%0.00%1.78%31.11%1.71%0.00%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDFDX and FHCCX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDFDX and FHCCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer